|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:11 PM Original message |
PA Senate is a nail biter. Sestak(D) up 3.3% with 70% reporting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Going down to the wire. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sestak will take it!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. 74.31% in: SESTAK 51.2%, TOOMEY: 48.8% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
5. geez, does anyone know what areas are left to report and how they vote???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Just hope it doesn't become another Franken situation. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whyverne (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. Somebody was spitting their tickets, since Onoroto already lost. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. 75.96% in: SESTAK 51.5%, TOOMEY: 48.5% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. I thought Toomey had it looking at the polls. Crossing my fingers now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
10. 78.93% in: SESTAK 50.4%, TOOMEY: 49.6% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Massive tightening 50.4% - 49.6% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. 81.98% in: SESTAK 50.2%, TOOMEY: 49.8% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. dang, not looking so good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. He is still ahead and even if he wins it by 1 I will be happy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Come on, Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. Toomey's starting to catch up a lot quicker now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. numbers switched is Sestak down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. CNN has Sestak up by 18,000 with 73% reporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. 84.77% in: SESTAK 49.9%, TOOMEY: 50.1% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. Toomey 50.1, Sestak 49.9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. 4,000 votes separate them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
22. Sestak 49.8 now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. 49.8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
23. 89.69% in: SESTAK 49.8%, TOOMEY: 50.2 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
25. Toomey will win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I'd say recount, but most of the state is touchscreen.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
budkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
26. He's down now and probably out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
28. 90.62% in: SESTAK 49.7%, TOOMEY: 50.3% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. I don't think this is going to be decided tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
31. Sestak is down by 23,000 with 90% in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
32. 92.61% in: SESTAK 49.5%, TOOMEY: 50.5% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. 96.67% in: SESTAK 49.4%, TOOMEY: 50.6% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
34. ACK! I WANT This one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. 96.84% in: SESTAK 49.4%, TOOMEY: 50.7% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetapogee (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. the morning call has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. No way in hell that's happening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetapogee (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Exactly. There's no way Toomey's getting that margin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. I think it's over unless I'm missing something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetapogee (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-02-10 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
41. The Morning Call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC