Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is California a state of prohibitionists?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:00 AM
Original message
Is California a state of prohibitionists?
Prop 8 passed and Prop 19 failed

This is in a state that overwhelmingly elects dems state wide. What's the story in California?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Urban vs rural
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's irrelevant
Obama, Brown, Boxer, etc. win there with the same exact set of voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. No it is not
you keep telling yourself that.

I should also remind you that Boxer and Brown came out AGAINST IT.

It is very much that. This state is actually split between the coast and the hinterlands aka the urban vs rural. Used to be north south by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. But it's the same set of voters.
It doesn't matter that the coast is different from the hinterlands. It's the same voters voting for governor that are voting for prop 19.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes and these set of voters
are pretty socially conservative... but in things like pot... you have quite a bit of dominance from the hinterlands, the churches, etcetera.

Wait for the post mortem, but I can tell you that the people behind the no on 19 were the SAME folks behind Pro - 8.

I live in this state and at times they drive me nuts.

They complain about things like less city services (where I live) but they will not tax themselves up by half a cent...

They complain about cops and the war on drugs, but they will vote against things like 19 and for 8 because the Padre told them.

It is NOT such a liberal state. It is very conservative, with some liberal lights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would it be any different anywhere else?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's not the point.
Left leaners are the majority there, but the two propositions went to the right. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. A medical marijuana proposal failed in Oregon, while a minimum sentence law passed.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 AM by HuckleB
Meanwhile, Oregon will be sending just as many Dems to the House as it has for years, although we are dumb enough to elect and idiot back-up NBA center to the Governorship.

In other words, it appears that marijuana is going down everywhere this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Apparently. Was marijuana on the ballot in your state?
How's it doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. No
But if it can't pass in CA, can it pass in NY? I'm not so sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Getting it on the ballot was an accomplishment
so I'm not sure we deserve the "prohibitionist" label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think it's well deserved.
Props 8 and 19 went up for a popular vote. It's not some BS legislature vote. All the voters could vote and both failed. I think it says something about the voters of California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Hmm. What does it say about the voters of NY that they can't
put either issue up to a vote? Just curious.

At least you didn't elect nutcase Paladino and his goddamn bat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I think it says something about the egregious lack of statewide organization
in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. Prop H8 passed
because of the churches and millions in outside funding. Prop. 19 has me stumped, however. Maybe if Boxer, Feinstein, Brown, OBAMA AND HOLDER would have come out for it, it would have had a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is a fundamental misunderstanding where California politics are concerned.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 AM by TwilightZone
Large chunks of the state are very conservative.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2010/results/state/#CA

Review the Senate results by county, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's irrelevant
The state as a whole is Democratic. It's the same set of voters in the gubernatorial, and senatorial elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:09 AM
Original message
No state "as a whole" is Democratic.
And no state "as a whole" is Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. Right, but the majority is Democratic
And the majority is prohibitionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. Large chunks of the state
continue to be ignored by the Democratic Party. CA-19 put up a sacrifice candidate who never even campaigned, CA-20 had a Blue Dog who lost and CA-21 went unopposed by the Democrats. It's the same throughout the Valley, so, I ask you, is it any wonder that the central part of the state, always the butt of asinine "jokes" about "hayseeds" from the geographical elitists consistently send Republicans to Congress? It's a self-fulfilling prophecy so before you start blaming the conservative parts of the state, perhaps you can ask the CDP WHERE THE HELL IT WAS during the entire election cycle because they sure as hell had NO representatives in the Valley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. I want to wait and see the numbers. Remember, everyone jumped on
minority voters for H8 based on one poll that turned out to be wrong AND it was later determined that the H8 vote in L.A. County was corrupted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. We have some hot spots of
Red areas in Southern California. At least Northern California remains true blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Define "Northern California"
Looks to me like Northern California is VERY red outside the Bay Area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. No it does not
the split USED to be north south... these days it is East- West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Many pro-marijuana people and growers voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. +100 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I'm sure that's true, but I don't think that's enough to change the outcome.
Prop 19 is losing by 320K votes. Brown is winning by 93K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. you miss the point
many liberal sources (LA times) told people to back Brown but to vote no on prop 19. My own liberal district voter guide left the prop off the list. So it's not so simple to assume a liberal Brown voter was going to vote for this. Had the election climate been better or Prop 19 had some solid organizational people behind it, more people running for office might have backed it. There simply wasn't anyone out there saying how dare Boxer or Brown or even the Rethugs not back this measure. Since no one did, and it pretty much wasn't even brought up as an important issue by any of the candidates, it frankly got ignored by the voters. It clearly was discounted by the major endorsers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. no one voted FOR the prop
generally props fail in this state when no one backs the prop. In this case there simply wasn't any campaign for it and in a bad political year it simply wasn't on the radar for anyone to back. It was the wrong election for this and the wrong political campaign for this. I think this state is heading for legalizing pot (heck it's basically legal now as a medical pot thing). Most liberal sources left it off their recommendation list or said vote no. So that's pretty much your answer. When it comes back it needs more organization and an economy not in the crapper so people can feel safe backing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'll tell you what the story is:
It's urban vs. rural in that all the people who organize progressive propositions live in the Bay Area and LA and they give up on the rest of the state.

There are about 40 counties in California that are off the map when it comes to democratic candidates or progressive legislation.

The democratic party here SUCKS, in other words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. NOT TO MENTION
The fact that with both 8 and 19, you can't have the gays and the potheads run the campaign, because they're too close to the issue. You need someone detached from the issue to run the campaign.

Prop 8 was a clusterfuck, and I got the sense that the people in charge were afraid to leave San Francisco.

19 was fought on the battleground of "How do you tell if someone's driving around high?" and "Fuck Mexicans" while it SHOULD have been fought on the battleground of spending money to keep potheads locked up in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. The prop had a lot of complicated details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
29. Did you too have a marijuana prop. in your state?
How do you think one would do in your state?

Unfortunately I think there are still too many people, even on the two more left leaning coasts, who don't even know what they are afraid of, when it comes to weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. We don't
And after seeing this, I'm pretty sure it would fail here too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
30. California is quickly becoming a "minority" majority state.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:31 AM by 4lbs
Minorities (Latinos, Blacks, Asians, Pacific-Islanders) are the majority of the state's population or will be very soon.

That's good for the Democratic Party since minorities are usually Democratic in registration. That is reflected in the state legislative positions, U.S. Reps, and Senators, which are often Democratic.

However, Latinos are quickly becoming the largest voting bloc in the state. Latinos are overwhelmingly Catholic. Catholic conservative. Most have ties to Mexico or other parts of Central America, where about 90% of those countries' populations are Catholic. These are practicing Catholics that go to church every Sunday and also attend Masses.

So, while that means California will have success supporting labor unions, unemployment, welfare, public education, the environment, alternative energy, immigration reform, and other social issues that help all the people, as per the Democratic platform, it also means state propositions that tend to go against conservative Catholicism (and for the most part Protestant Christianity), will struggle.

Prop H8 and Prop 19 went against that religious aspect, and failed. "The official Church position" overrode any Democratic social fairness and justice aspect of these propositions.

Courting and counting on minority voters in California can be a double-edged sword. One edge will help get Democratic people elected and most Democratic policies passed. However, the other edge will cause issues and propositions to fail if they go against minority voters' religious beliefs.

That is reflected in the 2008 election. Eighty percent of Latinos that voted in California voted for President Obama, but only half that, 40% voted NO on Prop H8.

EDIT: Furthermore, most of the immigrant Asians in California come from oppressive authoritarian governments, so they tend to actually join the Republican party which is the champion of smaller, less, or no government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC