|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
OmahaBlueDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:53 AM Original message |
Poll question: Based on what you have seen tonight, who do you think emerges as the GOP Presidential frontrunner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Fred Thomas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. So many names,who can beat the Prez in a debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
3. I was thinking Jeb Bush. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I think he will give it at least a shot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mortos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Haven't you heard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
5. Mittens. It was always going to be Mittens. They will bribe the grifter not to run. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lil Missy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. None tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
7. They'll wait to see if Obama runs for a 2nd term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. They'll need another throwaway in 2012. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Isn't that what Palin is for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:22 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Yep. If they have to get serious they'll probably run Jeb Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Could be, but I think she's primary fodder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
8. I think Pawlenty has a shot at 2012. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. little timmy pawlenty is a worthless puke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Sure he is, but I still think he's the only viable repuke they've got... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. He polled 1% in Iowa earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Wow. I didn't realize he was that low. I have to rethink this. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
9. Nozzle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'm afraid it is going to be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
14. Marco Rubio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liquorice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I agree. It's probably going to be Rubio. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
15. Marco Rubio has a future - probably 2016/20 -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
16. JEBtm Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
17. jeb bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
23. Either Haley Barbor or Romney because they'll jump on palin to keep her from getting the nod. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
24. Thune Pawlenty Scott Brown. Two of those 3 names as a ticket. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
25. You need to check out Gov Perry (TX) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
26. Mitch Daniels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dimbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
29. You have to go for the zeitgeist, the spirit of the time, the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LatteLibertine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-10 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
30. Honestly after today I'm worried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC