I would like to thank the Tea Baggers... no seriously
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 04:14 AM
Original message |
I would like to thank the Tea Baggers... no seriously |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 04:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. they cost repukes the Senate |
|
now if they'd only crawl back under the rock they came from
|
RSillsbee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 04:16 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I died laughing when they started saying Coons had "topped" her |
|
Not that I'd mind "topping" her
|
bluedeminredstate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 04:23 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Did you go cast your vote against Cantor yesterday? It was my 18 year old's first trip to the voting booth and he was severely bummed out at the ballot: one race with no chance of an upset and 3 ballot measures. I told him that there are years when it feels like it's not worth the time to go out and vote when you know a little prick like Cantor is going to win no matter what, but it feels good to do it anyway. Who knows? One day he could be running for governor of California and his shitty voting record could become a campaign issue like it did for money bags Whitman. Might as well start laying out a good track record...
:patriot:
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Voted for Waugh and YES on all three Constitutional amendments
|
happi1
(69 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
true dat..these cats worry I and I though. They can siphon votes and spoil...but if they ever mainstream we are fucked.
but then again...once anything gains a bit of traction they can be targetd with monies.
Also, hugs : )
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 05:35 AM by underpants
:hi:
If'n I haven't before
Lets see how quickly "Tea Party favored" candidates dive headfirst into the establishment fold
|
happi1
(69 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. rock and roll mickeyds |
|
Did I just get a welcome? 0_0
|
happi1
(69 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
targetd
could spell once : (
Did any of you cats hit any nice bake sales on the way out of voting yest? : )
|
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 05:37 AM
Response to Original message |
8. i agree. if they didn't have all these candidates, the republicans would have probably won more |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.