jerry brown 54 to 41... barbara boxer 52 to 42...not even close
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:19 AM
Original message |
jerry brown 54 to 41... barbara boxer 52 to 42...not even close |
|
how wrong were the pundits in california?
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It was a way to gin up the campaign commercial spending |
|
Neither side dared believe their own polling, as long as the mainstream pollsters/media kept telling everyone it was neck & neck..
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
The media outlets got used to all that $love$. :loveya:
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
3. A lot of money from Whitman/Fiorina's investment accounts |
|
back into the CA economy. Great way to start the term. :thumbsup:
|
virtualobserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
4. at least she poured 160 million plus into the local economy |
|
Billionaires don't normally do that willingly. California is saying thanks, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Anyone figured out how much Witman paid for each vote she received? |
|
Sure like to see those numbers.
Don
|
pinboy3niner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I saw a report that it was about $16 per voter |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:35 AM by pinboy3niner
|
Inuca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. According to the punditry |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 09:27 AM by Inuca
not as much as McMahon did in CT, smaller state, you know :-)
|
pinboy3niner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. The same report said McMahon spent $37 per voter |
|
Huge difference in state populations.
|
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Which is why I don't understand |
|
how Prop. 19 didn't pass. The Democrats obviously came out for the candidates but not for legalization? I can't believe there are that many ignorant Democrats here but apparently there are.
|
Democat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
11. What were Rasmussen's last polls on those races? Way off I think! |
|
Was he trying to change the election or report on it?
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Watching those two disgusting harpies lose is very sweet indeed. |
|
Same goes for those other disgusting teabagger women.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.