Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OFFICIAL OBAMA PRESS CONFERENCE THREAD =NOW ENDED= (link)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:01 PM
Original message
OFFICIAL OBAMA PRESS CONFERENCE THREAD =NOW ENDED= (link)
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:58 PM by Poll_Blind
Watch it LIVE at White House: LIVE @ Whitehouse.gov

I'm not an Ed Shultz listener but I was listening today and he said something I thought was very true: "The hourglass has been turned over on the Obama administration", meaning time is running out and whether he chooses to work agains the Republicans or continue to work with them, this press conference will likely answer questions about his choice on the matter.

---FEED IS NOW LIVE AND STREAMING---

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is LIVE right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Smart money's on "work with" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed, but the Republicans are pigs and working "with" means that...
...the Republicans are willing to put something on the line too, in negotiation. I'm not sure they'll do that.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why did thank Harry Reid for his service?
Did the Dems lose the Senate? I don't get why he said he told McConnell he looked forward to working with him!

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because they are all spineless pushovers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanking Harry Reid for his service makes it sound like a nudge out of the
Majority Leader position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:10 PM
Original message
He just said "he's not too naive to think people will put politics aside"
Yes he is! Obama has been too naive and that is why we lost yesterday. Obama doesn't get it. We are in a fucking war against the right wing enemy. Wake the fuck up Obama!!!!

Damn he is pissing me off!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Updates for cube rats would be much appreciated.
I am interested to see how many times he mentions bipartisanship, compromise and across the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. He wants to sit down with members of both parties, find common ground.
Vote reflected the frustration of the American people re: economy, jobs, etc.

Work harder at building consensus.

Hope for civility and progress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I could have written it. Naivete and foolishness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
85. In other words; he's learned nothing
not that any of us are surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #85
111. I think you are missing the long term strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jobs, energy, children's future. "Most important contest we face is not...
...between D's and R's, most important this century is between America and her economic competitors. To do this we need to be united."

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just more blah, blah, blah... And no guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Candidate Obama and President Obama are
most definitely two different people. He once had some fire, some spirit. Once he became president, his speeches and what he does has turned into this milquetoast drivel. It's so frustrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:29 PM
Original message
What? You expected him to do a song and dance or something?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
113. I expected more than for him to be a human jellyfish, constantly caving to the enemy.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 06:56 PM by AnArmyVeteran
And even after every republican leader vowed to not compromise with him Obama will continue to give away even more of what he promised. Candidate Obama has disappeared and I have no idea who the man in the White House is anymore. I worked my ass off for over a year and spent a lot of money to get him elected, just so he could run terrified from every fight with republicans. The very least I should have gotten for my efforts (and millions of others) was someone with a spine.

Obama is now going to give away the rest of the promises he made by caving to the same republicans who virtually destroyed this country. Tea baggers are insane, but at least most appear to have backbones. Yeah I'm mad and I have every right to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Don't want to spend the next 2 years refighting the battles of the last 2."
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The repubs do and will. Wisen up, Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I wonder what he'll say when the R's start impeachment proceedings against him
as they've already stated they plan to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. I haven't looked into that much yet but I would not be surprised if they did.
They're just that fucked up.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
71. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
76. Doesn't matter what he wants.
That's what you're gonna be doing. Get good at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am tired of hearing about compromise. We did that the past 2 years and
it got us nowhere. Pandering to the lowest common denominator is a path to failure. I hear no defiance and no challenge to the failed policies of the RW who got lucky and got elected last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
84. Bingo! This is truly the definition of insanity and I can't stand it anymore!
All you get from beating a dead horse is sore arms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Original message
"I do believe there is hope for civility. I do believe there is hope for progress."
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Such passion and resolve. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
90. cube rat who is just wondering "wtf"...
sorry but I strongly feel we need a primary challenger in '12 or we'll be screwed even worse than in 2000

there is NO HOPE FOR CIVILITY OR PROGRESS with reactionary racist segregationists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. At this point he pretty much just puts me to sleep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Building consensus = doing EVERYTHING exactly how the RW wants it.
GET A SPINE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. "While we may be proud D's or proud R's, we are all proud Americans."
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Jon Stewart would be proud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's not giving much to the GOP at all. Said no single side holds all the power. Said he fully
expects both sides to work on goals the nation needs addressed. Says focusing on issues from the past two years is a waste of time and won't accomplish anything.

Looks like he's holding strong to the idea of moving forward and not getting mired in any gridlock.

Questions now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Done speaking, now onto questions. A bit surprising to me.
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. Now taking questions from press.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. He doesn't have a lot of options. The House will do what the
house does. He can veto bills, of course, and probably will. But if anything is to happen, some things have to get enacted and signed. The country doesn't stop for 2 years. There are going to be compromises. There's no other option if things are to continue at all. We'll have to see where he draws the line, and where the Senate draws its line. Get ready for a lot of strife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Platitudes, concessions to the Repugs, and politics-as-usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
56. Yeah, cause the President writes the laws, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Right! I forgot that the "most powerful man in the world" is powerless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. Legislative branch...
we have one and its responsibilities are enumerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. Q: Were last night's results a repudiation of your agenda? Who speaks for America, you or Boehner?
Very non-specific answer to it so far but he did mention common ground between the D's and the R's in regards to the shitty economy.

Calls for responsibility, working harder to come to consensus to keep the economy going for "children and grandchildren."

As he reflects on election, he "has to to a better job, just like everyone in Washington does."

"(Everyone) has to sit down and work together" because electorate (in his opinion) don't carry a fixed ideology which is described by either R's or D's.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Obama seemed to imply that frustration with the economy was a large factor.
Savannah Guthrie up now, repeating the question (which was someone else's) and implying that the President "doesn't get it" and that his policies are at fault. Obama talking about averting the economic collapse when they first came into office and how that had to take precedence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. The only statement he could have made that would have fired me up:
"WE'RE RAMMING IT ALL THROUGH IN THE LAME-DUCK SESSION, MOTHERFUCKERS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. Q: I don't see a lot of reflection from you on your policies. Are you not "getting it", Mr. Pres.?
He responds it's still early yet in the press conference and there are more questions to go.

Talks about his role in bailing out the banks and auto companies- but explains this was because of an emergency, not necessarily his agenda (this is basically what he said)

Talks about "overreach" in regards to bailouts and again describes this as a response to an emergency economic situation.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Continuing, says in rush to get emergency bills passed, signed bills with earmarks in them.
Kind of tries to make the point that he hasn't done the kind of changes that people might have expected is because of the need to pass legislation so quickly.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sounds like he's saying
"I understand why people don't like liberal programs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. Q: Lots of R's ran against your healtchare law, some saying they'll repeal it. Is there a danger...
...to your healthcare law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. A: We'd be misreading the election if we re-litigate the last few years.
Goes into pro-healthcare legislation commentary.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. "Now, if the R's have IDEAS on how to improve our healthcare system. If they..
...have ideas on how to get faster reform (for businesses and people)...I'm happy to consider those ideas."

Mentions 1099 provision (?) requiring too much paperwork.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Me-ow! "If the Republicans have ideas" he'll consider them.
:rofl: It was encased in a lot of polite language but he said that as part of his last answer, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I didn't like that bit. It concerns me a lot. TO BE FAIR he said he didn't think there....
..would be much support to agressively go after the current legislation but what I was hoping was "Fuck NO, I will set anyone on fire who tries to fuck with this legislation."

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. First, he can't. Second, when people learn what the individual provisions in the
law are, they're in favor of them. Going after "Obamacare" is a two-edged sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. What can he say?
I mean, really?

He squandered two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 PM
Original message
Are you watching the press conference? He doesn't look unconfident or nervous
at all. He's just standing there calmly answering questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
104. He looks like he's been beat down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
79. self-delete; wrong place in thread. n/t
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:49 PM by gkhouston
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
38. fucking weak.
sorry.

but it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
43. His answer about working with R's to amend the healthcare laws scares the shit out of me.
You kind of have to be listening live to know what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
58. I heard that.
I think he's talking about rescinding the pre-existing conditions part of the health care reform bill, because the Republicans don't like it. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. "It also means 1 out of 2 voters think it was the right thing to do."
DAMN is it nice to have an intelligent adult in the White House!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
47. Q: Is spending to create jobs now a dead issue given the R's won't go for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. A: References his Deficit Comission. Talks about cutting programs that don't work,
but NOT cutting core investments- I actually don't know what he's saying by that. (sorry)

"What are our priorities? What do we care about? That's going to be a tough debate. I've inherited a big deficit, which has been made wose by the recession. I don't want to cut education or research and development because if we can devleop new tech like clean energy that could make al the difference in regareds to creating jobs her at home. We shoudl be able ot agree now it makes no sense for China to have better rail systems than us or Singapore having (something else). China has best supercomputer on Earth now, (and that sucks because we need to have that kind of cutting edge tech)

During lame duck session, taxes shoudl not go up on middle class families next year.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. "Extend unemployment insurance" Talks about balancing budget cuts which....
...help job growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. "Without any R support on anything, it's going to be hard to get things done. But I don't...
...anticipate that." (paraphrased)

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Talks about accelerated depreciation for business. Says it's not considered a liberal idea and...
...that's actually an R/Big Business idea. (I think he's supporting this or at least conceding it in negotiation)

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
69. Thanks a lot for your rush transcripts!
I can't watch it live right now and it's really good to get an idea of what he's actually saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. It's good you can't see it. Republicans are painting a yellow stripe down his back.
And Obama is letting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. More like a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #82
93. Exactly, and Obama thinks he's being fitted for a new suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #49
103. You're pretty fast at the transcribing...
Do you have experience with this? Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. OMG. Just said his "Deficit Commission will include Democrats and Republicans." LESSON NOT LEARNED.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:25 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. They are coming for SS and medicare. Book it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Yep.
What will all the Tea Baggers have to say when THAT happens?

Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Yup.
We're fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
74. It already does.
It's the "Catfood commission". I think they're due to present their findings/proposals before in the next 2mos. Unfortunately both co-chairmen are on the record as wanting to gut SS and medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
101. If President Obama agrees to compromise
social security I will actively support an Obama opponent in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. Q: What policies will you compromise on now that you didn't in the past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. A: I've been willing to compromise since taking office. Let's find those areas...
...on which we both agree.

Mentions: Electric cars being developed in the U.S., something about natural gas/oil research, restarting nuclear industry as a means of reducing depedence on foreign oil.

Fuel efficiency for cars and trucks and working with corporations and shareholders (and unions, I believe) to get it done.

Talks about problems between D's and R's causing shift to look at topics they DO agree on.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
57. People would have more confidence in my policy choices
if unemployment was 5% instead of 9.6%.

Re: health care: if repubs have ideas on how to improve health care, he's willing to consider them. Need to talk with r's on specific objections, not generalities. Will not scrap HRC, but willing to "tweek" it.

Spending: Deficit commission will be putting forth it's ideas. Hopefuly, they'll have ideas on how to save money, streamline govt (no mention of specifics). Doesn't want to cut back on ed, reasearch and development. Wants to look at all ideas on the table to create jobs. Wants to extend unemployment insurance, keep taxes down.

Chip Reid: What you call investments, repubs call wasteful spending, dead in the water.
Obama: We all have to come to the table with an open mind.

Obama: I was willing to compromise in the past, and I'm willing to compromise going forward. Need to find areas where we can agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #57
99. He is absolutely correct on this point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
60. Oil, coal and nuke industries are safe!


Yay!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
62. Q: Willing to compromise on Bush tax cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. A: (Doesn't want to raise taxes on middle class (no "spike"))
Wants to see middle class extensions but also doing things to help businesses invest to grow the economy. Says it all needs to eb worked out with Boehner, Reid, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. You knew that would happen. Dems didn't want to piss off rich sugar daddies,
so they delayed the vote so that the Repugs could take the credit for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
66. Good question on health care.
Do you regret making those deals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
67. I won't be able to keep up with the Q's and A's, please tun in if you can. Also..
...there will be a transcript published by the White House not too long from now.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
70. So long, Cap & Trade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
72. You have to be pretty brave to watch that
I fear he will be cowering and giving up the little bits he's managed to claim over two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
73. More Compromise
How did that work out for you?
I'm sick of all the reaching out the Republicans. I hope Grayson or some with a spine runs against him in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
75. Good job not answering the question on DADT Mr. President.
Way to show a spine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
78. Does he still think that the GOP will be willing to work with him?
When they have made no bones about shutting him down, and you have people like Rand Paul now in the mix?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
80. OMG!
Ed Henry,CNN: re: your statement that if you want the car to go forward, put it in D, do you think,based on election, that American's think your policies have put the country in reverse? Obama: No, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Hang on, I covered that up-thread in the wrong place. Let me grab it...
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 12:51 PM by gkhouston
Here: Ed Henry asked Obama about the car analogy; wanted to know if Obama thought maybe he was wrong about the Dems putting the car in "forward" since that idea was apparently "rejected" by the voters. Obama explicitly said no, the Dems are going in reverse, at the worst, we're stuck in neutral, and the D's and R's are pushing on the car in opposing directions. Henry not happy about that answer. :rofl:

Obama says DADT might come up for vote in the lame duck session but I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. You know, the President's party got its collective ass kicked last night, yet he's
collected, coherent, and responsive. Compare and contrast to interviews with Boehner, McConnell, etc.

He's not done yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #86
95. He was very sharp and well spoken considering he probably stayed up almost all night nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
87. "Great leaders -- Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan"?????
He would have done well to mention Jimmy Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
88. Obama "I don't believe people walk around with a fixed idealology". LOLOLOL!!!!
Obama "I don't believe people walk around with a fixed idealology". LOLOLOL!!!!

There are no levels of cluelessness than what I am listening to from Obama right now. The level of cluelessness is profound! No one in this country (except for Obama) could believe what he just said. It's delusional to believe people dont have ideologies. The right wing has been trying to destroy him for over two years. Our country is filled with right wing fanatics from coast to coast who want him destroyed or worse. No one, NO ONE could be this clueless, delusional or stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
89. Just listening to the audio, there is a melancholy mixed in with so many of his answers.
Just wondering if anyone else noticed that? I'm just listening to the audio at the moment, not sure what it looks like.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. It's coming across on tv, too.
In fact, I was just getting ready to post how sad he seems, especially in that last answer to the question as to if he was "out of touch".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. I had the video on, too. He looked reflective, but not melancholic. He seemed
to be thinking of a lot of his answers as he spoke them, instead of giving canned responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. To me he looked and sounded very tired,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queenjane Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
96. My personal take on Obama's reactions
is that he is just stunned, baffled, discombobulated, by the rabid, foaming, spitting hostility towards him from the Right. Seriously. He campaigned on HELPING this country recover from 8 years of mismanagement, on aiding the middle & lower classes, and was met with a tsunami of rage from the Republican party and its minions. I truly believe he still can't comprehend it. Not excusing his lack of fight, just wondering if the hatred has so thrown him off his game that he can't muster the will to fight back.

Which doesn't help us or the country, of course. I think he's biggest mistake was/is overestimating the intelligence of the American rabble. Continuing to insist that the people "get it" is beyond naive, and very dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
97. Appearance of bipartisanship by Obama is good in the long term. Make it clear
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:13 PM by alfredo
That it is the Reps that are being unreasonable and obstructive. We want wall to wall investigations. We want the Reps to spend more time investigating every little thing. We want them to be all they can be. Encourage them to impeach Obama, and to shut down our government. We want them to go after Medicare and Social Security. We want them to go after the patients bill of rights and other protections under HCR. We want them to attempt to repeal wall st reform.

We also want Rove to continue, as promised, his CrossroadsGPS/American Crossroads TV ads. We want them to continue the ugliness.

Be the assholes we've grown to love. Feel free to show your ass holiness to the world Republicans. Let you light shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. I agree, we have to drum the poor attitudes and lack of cooperation from the Repubs
into the heads of reasonable Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #100
110. We will be able to frame them as more interested in punishing Obama than doing
Doing the people's work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeeLeft7x Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
98. Typical Lousy Questions
by the dopes in the news media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
102. Weak, mamby-pamby response by the President. I'm floored. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
105. I couldn't bear to watch. Can anyone sum it up in one word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. Mamby-pamby. That might be two words. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Jeeeeez - we're so fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
108. I think I'm pretty critical of the president at times...
... but despite all the work-together talk at the press conference, I don't mind it too much.

You have to pay lip service to the notion, held by most Americans, that the parties need to work together.

Even if you're privately thinking, "Well, screw you guys--you won the election by cynical obstructionism and baseless fearmongering, and you'll get your tax cuts for the wealthy over my cold dead body, and I'm going to go over your heads to the people and make you wish you dread the day you thought running for office might be a good idea," you can't say that out loud today.

BUT...

All of that happy-talk about finding common ground, etc. better only be lip service. Politics is sometimes about shaking hands with one hand for the cameras while picking up the knife with the other. We'd better see some real spine and aggressiveness.

The tax cuts will be a big first test. In the lame duck session, we still have both houses of Congress. The public overwhelmingly supports our position--extend the middle class ones, retire the ones for the wealthy. If we can't muscle that through, then it's going to be a very long two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neurotica Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. Well said...
I'll be waiting to see that spine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
112. Obama appeared unprepared for the the election results.
This worries me because most of us here, while still trying to be optimistic saw this coming.
Who is advising him? Beside his bedtime letter reading, does he ever go on the internet and
read what real Americans are posting about their circumstances and perceptions? It feels as if
other than his campaign trips, he's relying on some poor sources for his much needed reality checks.
Many of those around him have their own agendas. Rahm's race for mayor of Chicago is a good example.

I'm waiting to see if he makes any staff changes. If he does not, he's screwed in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC