Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican took the House. Get over it already

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:57 PM
Original message
The Republican took the House. Get over it already
I knew in November 2008 the Republicans would take back quite a few seats. I didn't necessarily believe they would become a majority, but I fully expected large losses.

When Obama took office we were already fighting two wars, we had enormous deficits and the economy was on the brink of a total collapse. Not a recession, a complete and total collapse of our financial system, the entire US auto industry and the combination would have caused other industries to collapse. Before I joined the army I worked in the private sector through a number of recessions. What we were facing in 2008 wasn't even close to any of those, it was fucking epic!

The Democratic Congress and President Obama passed all kinds of different legislation aimed at long and short term investments in jobs and our economy, along with new consumer protections and financial reforms and oversights to help prevent this shit in the future. And they did all of this when a Republican opposition who had one, single goal in mind - STOP the Democrats from fixing anything at all cost. No matter how much anyone bitches about what "more" they could have done, nothing would have created a rosey picture by now.

We've progressed from facing an economic apocalypse to the recession having been over since July of 2009, a painfully slow recovery and high unemployment. And that last point is what this election was really all about.

Unemployment is still very high! The American people have a very short term memory. Most Americans don't remember or don't care about what we were. They don't think about what the economic shit storm could have turned into. Most Americans don't even think about or care about who's fault it is. Times are hard and the Democrats are in power. Period, point blank.

Here are three reasons the Democrats were destined to lose seats

1: The Economy (the fact that the Democrats aren't the ones who fucked it up is irrelevant)

2: The party in power in the Executive branch always has tougher times in Congressional races.

3: The Democrats had already won the past couple Congressional elections and had a huge majority. You can only win so many seats and hanging on to power for the long haul is a feat under any circumstances.

Could the Democrats have played their hand better and saved a couple seats? Sure, absolutely. But the overall reason for the ass whooping wasn't because of the public option. It wasn't because Obama tried too hard to compromise. It wasn't for any other reason people like to scream about on the internet.

For the life of me I will never understand some of the obsessive hatred for Obama I've seen from some people online. Under Bill Clinton's Presidency we lost both the House *and* the Senate right away, and he didn't have the cards stacked against him nearly to the point Obama had. Bill Clinton also didn't inherit anything close to the pile of shit Obama had to contend with and to make matter worse, the Republicans are even more nasty, and more disciplined now than they were through most of Clintons administration. They didn't really start honing their asshole skills until the Impeachment proceedings, and that was toward the end.

Still, we Democrats lost the House and Senate never to regain them under Clinton's watch. I wasn't surfing the web back then (thanks for this, Gore) but among fellow Dems in the real world I didn't see nearly the shit flinging toward him over it as I do now.

It happens. It's politics. Have your pet peeves all you want about how Obama tried too hard to work with Republicans. Lord knows I have my own, and I'm willing to be Obama quietly has his own regrets about naively thinking in a crisis Republicans would step up to the plate. But let's be real. In the end this was about the economy, stupid.

Now can we stop all of the silly shit and start going after the real enemy? I'll give you a hint. It has a huge penis for a nose and loves to eat peanuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Best post of the past 24 hours. You win the internet.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am not that upset about losing the house. I am more upset we wasted the two year window we had.
It needed to be treated like they knew it would only last until the midterms and they should have ran roughshod to pass a health care bill with a medicare buyin.

Killed DODT.
Rolled back the Bush tax cuts for the rich.
And as many things as the possibly could have knowing full well the mid terms would end it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. So you're saying nothing has been accomplished in the last two years?
www.whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com

Use it as a palliative...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Didn't say that. Just said we could have done alot more if it had been treated as....
a window of opportunity from the start.

A medicare buy-in would have been a huge help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. I understand that everyone did not get everything, but to say the last two
years were wasted is a bit hyperbolic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. The economy is not like the weather
The economy is not fate, it is directly affected by government policy.

The fact that it was about the economy is not an excuse, it is an indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Only for those who *want* to indict the Democrats
Democratic Congress and President Obama passed all kinds of different legislation aimed at long and short term investments in jobs and our economy, along with new consumer protections and financial reforms and oversights to help prevent this shit in the future. And they did all of this when a Republican opposition who had one, single goal in mind - STOP the Democrats from fixing anything at all cost. No matter how much anyone bitches about what "more" they could have done, nothing would have created a rosey picture by now.


Such a huge economic crisis that was years in the making takes years to recover from. And unemployment is always the last economic indicator to improve when coming out of a recession, which BTW ended over a year ago. I can't believe you said that with a straight face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That is naive
Sorry, but the bill for America has been running since Ronnie Ray Gun, to expect change in 2 years is Magical thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rational, righteous rant! Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What's with Obama and pie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Obama likes pie, and I like Obama. That's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I love your sig pic. It's freaking hilarious!
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 06:26 PM by USArmyParatrooper
That look on his face like there's nothing else in the world besides him and that scrumptious piece of pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow. Losing a job, losing a home, having no healthcare = Pet Peeves
so noted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. You're twisting his words. Worth noting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I said nothing of the sort.
Anyone who reads the OP honestly can clearly see I stated the Economy (i.e. losing a job, home, etc.) is the real reason for the election outcome. And that pet peeves such as Obama being too willing to work with the right is not the real reason.

But your willingness to deliberately misrepresent what was said instead of debating honestly is also noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Obama working with the right is the reason the economy lost us the election
How's that?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Sorry. I'm not taking your bait.
Maybe one of your friends is a better fisherman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Three words:
Fab. U. Lous.

For the life of me I will never understand some of the obsessive hatred for Obama I've seen from some people online. Under Bill Clinton's Presidency we lost both the House *and* the Senate right away, and he didn't have the cards stacked against him nearly to the point Obama had. Bill Clinton also didn't inherit anything close to the pile of shit Obama had to contend with and to make matter worse, the Republicans are even more nasty, and more disciplined now than they were through most of Clintons administration.

...Now can we stop all of the silly shit and start going after the real enemy? I'll give you a hint. It has a huge penis for a nose and loves to eat peanuts.


NAILED. IT. Happy to rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pretty sane and sober for a rant. Thanks for posting
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. The blue dog lost in my former district in NY
and he tried to play all sides of field..Grayson and Feingold lost and they were thought to be Independent. It's just depended on what kind of people were sucked in by the propaganda on tv and by the big ugly campaign ads. That district in NY went mcpalin 58% in 2008..that's just stupid.

I just moved to a State in time to vote that the Dems Swept! New York, California, & Mass got Dem Gov!

We have a lot to celebrate and a lot to work on!..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. More mad about abandoning the 50 state strategy
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 06:28 PM by pstokely
Dems didn't even run a candidate in one Missouri house seat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I think that is a fair criticism
We were very successful utilizing the 50 state strategy. Why we did not use it this time around is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trekologer Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. That bums me out too
The Democrats didn't want to run on a national platform either. I think that was a mistake--they should have come out with a plan for what they wanted to do (sort of like what the GOP did, but with realistic, detailed plans). The Democrats didn't give voters reasons to vote for them, as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. We would likely have been successful anyway in 2006, it was a mid-term and people hated Bush-Cheney.
Then in 2008, you had the impeccable organizing ability of the Obama campaign, which turned out huge numbers of Democrats.

But, feel free to attribute all of that to the 50 State Strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I agree. Using the "DEAN!!!" logic, that clownish RNC chair is a genius
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. You mean the people who want to run to Canada now are crazy?
Say it isn't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I just might retire in Canada someday.
I like their laid back outlook. At least, the ones I met. Seems like a low stress place to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah! Let's make sure we learn NOTHING from yesterday's losses.
This is really simple: the Democrats and the White House employed a losing political strategy. How do we know this? Because they lost.

Ignoring this obvious fact is a sure way to lose even more seats in 2012, including that seat at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. K&R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. Beautiful post!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well done, you.
:yourock:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. K&R! well said, USArmyParatrooper! thank you for posting this! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CommonSensePLZ Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
38. Rec'd
but you forgot that he's a black, fascist, Kenyan Muslim who was a terrorist before he was on solid food. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
40. No such thing as a jobless recovery and we haven't net created a single job in years
If you're going to insist on the Wall Street definitions then no wonder you have the point of view you do.

All you need is the stock market humming along and a couple quarters of "growth" fueled by cannibalism of jobs and investment to declare a recovery then you are in for a shock.

The system is broken and real solutions are avoided like the plague or worse.

Recovery=the wealthy can make money

Dude, the housing situation is worse and more and more are without jobs. Every single month we are slipping further.

You can argue less bad, less quickly but recovery is a load that a Vitter sized diaper cannot contain.

Keep worshiping at the beltway alter but all the faith in the world ain't gonna save the shitpile from collapsing all over the working and poor people in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Amen, bro.
K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC