Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Californians Voted Democrat But . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:39 AM
Original message
Californians Voted Democrat But . . .
didn't pass Prop. 19. Think about that. The Democrats kicked Meg's ass as well as Carly's but Prop. 19 failed. I'm sure a statistician or analyst can point out where I'm wrong, but, on the surface, doesn't it seem that a whole lot of Democrats voted "no?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. They did vote against rolling back pollution standards, and a lot of other progressive issues /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. they could have abstained
without knowing totals I can't say for sure that a lot of Dems voted no but it is quite likely. The only other option is that prop 19 had significantly fewer Dems vote on it at all than voted overall. It should be noted that no elected or trying to be elected Democrat at the state level endorsed it so that might suggest that there was a significant Democratic no vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think you may have something there.
No politicos would come out in favor of it. Too bad because the SEIU came out for it. I was hoping there would be a lot of closet "yes" voters but, apparently, it was exactly the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. no. abstentions were not the reason
In the Senate race, 7,441,687 votes were cast (3.86 million for Boxer). On prop 19, there were 7,418,587 (only 3.42 million). The 23,000 fewer votes cast on prop 19 doesn't explain the more than 400,000 differential between Boxer's total and the pro-19 total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. I had assumed that was unlikely but it was a remote possibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure a whole lot of Democrats voted "no" on Prop 19.
It would be more surprising if a whole lot of Libertarians voted "no" on Prop 19. I'm don't think you're likely to find a unified position on drugs (using that word because my guess is that's how most "no" voters see marijuana) across the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. There's a thread here in GD this morning
posted by a Californian explaining the no vote. I'd find it, but I'm getting ready to go to work.

Something about regulation and criminalizing something....I'm sorry I don't remember it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Here's a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, I saw it.
Spewing the right wing talking points that have been countered thousands of times at which time they hold their hands to their ears and sing, "Tra la la la la la . . . don't confuse me with the facts, I know what I know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulsh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. The 3 people I know who voted NO on 19 all smoke pot and
do not have a medicinal marijuana card. All of them are Democrats. Two of them who smoke a lot of pot all the time voted against 19 because they "didn't want government and big corporations to get the money from pot." The other one is a school teacher who no longer smokes very often, doesn't want kids having easier access to pot.

My wife and I and all of our relatives voted yes on 19. Even our very conservative relatives voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. There was quite a vocal campaign against the measure from the left.
The narrative is that growers and players in the current medical industry think the status quo is just dandy and we should leave well enough alone.

I was convinced that it was a step in the right direction. I voted Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Prop 19 - No, Prop 8 - Yes.
Yet CA essentially had a Democratic sweep on Tuesday. I can't explain it, except to say that perhaps the fact that most of us were raised with rather strong anti-drug propaganda and in religions that frown on gay marriage might play a part. On top of that, you have institutions with a helluva lot of money - drug dealers/cartels and religions throwing money and propaganda towards these issues. Too many American minds are pretty easy to tap and bend one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. CA Democrats also cast the votes that passed Prop 8
So they are what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. What can I say?
We're a mixed bag down here. Just when we think we're the most progressive state in the union, something like Prop. H8 comes along and passes. Now, if we could just get rid of the destructive churches (99% of them) . . . :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Born and raised there, been here a few years now
But I know CA politics going back many long years. This election is encouraging to me after the last few there. The apathy is fading, and that is good. CA will pull it all the way out eventually. I'm stoked that CA and OR both elected former Democratic Governors back into office, Brown and Kitzhaber. Our expansioin of our Medical Marijuana law also failed to pass this time.
I think CA did better this election that in many cycles past. 19 aside and also 8, the trend is good in CA again. As long as we remember that CA is not auto-Blue, we can keep it Blue. Oregon too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. I've heard that many thought the prop was a corporate takeover of pot-growing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. You and me both cannot figure this one...except...
...I think that a lot that gave California the Dem win was an anti Repuke feeling in the general voting population. I know staunch Repukes that passed voting for both Nutmeg and Carly. IMO, it seems like many of those conservatives then went on to keep the deamon weed outlawed. Also, another IMO, I think that the Gulf oil spill gave a huge boost to prop 23. No one around here ~~ I live in a beach area ~~ maybe even kinda wanted that kind of bullshit. But...again...where I am, PV area, there are a lot of people with those "family values" that say that weed leads to hard drug use.

JMHO -- but a lot of guessing included...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. Does this mean
that they are not "real" Democrats because they dared to vote how they wanted, instead of how progressives wanted them to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Um, no.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Just checking
seems everybody else who doesn't vote in lock-step with progressives aren't 'real' Democrats. Think they are called Blue Dogs, Republican Lite and conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Isn't that interesting?
The only ones I hear the charge re: "real Democrats" are those who demand the Progressives shut up and vote and never EVER ask questions as in, ". . . otherwise, you're not a REAL Democrat." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Very interesting indeed
Especially with all the posts the last couple days about so-called 'Blue Dogs' losing only because they weren't 'real Democrats.' That the people didn't vote for them only because they weren't progressives. That progressives should create a 'real Democrat' wing of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. We need a front organization to get Prop 19 on every state ballot in 2012
Time to beat the Repugs at their own game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I would go more for ballot measures that make abortion decisions...
...solely between a woman and her medical provider. Then we do the MJ issues. While I may be well past the age of personal considerations as to reproductive rights, I will NEVER forget the 1960s when I found someone I knew who had bled to death from a botched illegal abortion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Hell, do both... but the MJ issue is one that will definitely get a greater % of young people out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Yep...
...I think that MJ is pretty much accepted by the "youth" -- whatever age group that may be! I am in my 60s and I have less than -0- problem with those who toke.

GMAB...it is the liquor industry that is afraid of grass. This bull about it leading to hard drug use has been around for YEARS. Those who are substance abuse prone are going to find their drug of choice...PERIOD. The availability of grass has nothing to do with how someone is geared towards having or not having a propensity to abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. Get funding from the soft drink and snack industries and maybe fast food!
to get the initiatives on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. No, abortion amendments just bring out the fundies. MJ will bring out the young people.
We can win on the abortion issue if we can WIN BACK the SUPREME COURT. That means we need to win elections. Putting abortion on the ballot is an old Rovian trick to brick out the knuckle draggers.
Young people should be supportive, but since they never lived thru the 60's & earlier, they just don't understand the implications of losing abortion & contraceptive rights. They take it for granted.

This said, I am a huge supporter of a woman's right to choose. I just think we need to be careful about throwing red meat to the fundies at election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. who gives a fuck about prop 19. It was prop 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 that mattered
That some of the worst ideas passed and some of the best were voted down means many more long years of service cutting at the expense of the rich living like kings and queens. Prop 19 was a huge distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I did.
As did the MILLIONS whose lives have been decimated because of draconian, racist marijuana laws. And thanks for caring. :sneer:

P.S. If you don't care so much, why did you post on this thread? Nevermind. It's rhetorical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
25. From where I'm sitting
the pro-19 people failed to articulate what a yes vote would mean.

It was a game that was played on the field of drunk/impaired driving, while the dialogue should have been about throwing good money after bad for the failed war on drugs. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CommonSensePLZ Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. Yay! Callie's pro-sobriety!
Doesn't matter that 19 failed, everyone for it probably cracked out the special hash to grieve. The people who want it are going to get it, said it before and it bears repeating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I voted for it.
I've been clean for 14 years.

Most people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. A whole lot of nice people voted yes on H8, too.
Can't explain it other than to say it's hard to let go of ingrained prejudices.

Gays bad. Pot bad.

It's the intiative system that has to go. It's a bad way to govern. Because most people are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I disagree with you on the initiative process.
Has it been infiltrated and corrupted by corporate interests? Yes. But, for the most part, people weren't fooled by, say, Prop. 23 and it IS a way for things like MM and legalization to get on the ballot. Our corporate milquetoast Democrats sure as hell aren't going to touch it so the ONLY way to get it on the ballot is by initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Don't forget that Humboldt growers have been...
hiring pickers heavily for the past month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
36. Maybe because there are a lot more important issues out there than legal pot.
And God forbid a liberal or Democrat may not agree with legalized pot, but far as I know being a liberal or Democrat doesn't hinge solely on the issue of legalized pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
37. I was under the impression that some of the top MJ advocates were not
for this law because the saw it as flawed.

I know that the MJ Dispensary folks were against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
39. The medical marijuana industry voted down
Proposition 19, the growers, the dispensaries and the clinics who provide the recommendations. It would have put them out of business. This time it was an inside job. I work for a doctor who provides letters for medical marijuana and he told me it was going down because of the way it was written. The industry didn't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC