|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:39 AM Original message |
Californians Voted Democrat But . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. They did vote against rolling back pollution standards, and a lot of other progressive issues /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. they could have abstained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I think you may have something there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. no. abstentions were not the reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
35. I had assumed that was unlikely but it was a remote possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'm sure a whole lot of Democrats voted "no" on Prop 19. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. There's a thread here in GD this morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Here's a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yeah, I saw it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mulsh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. The 3 people I know who voted NO on 19 all smoke pot and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. There was quite a vocal campaign against the measure from the left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. Prop 19 - No, Prop 8 - Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
11. CA Democrats also cast the votes that passed Prop 8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. What can I say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Born and raised there, been here a few years now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. I've heard that many thought the prop was a corporate takeover of pot-growing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
13. You and me both cannot figure this one...except... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
14. Does this mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:33 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Um, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
32. Just checking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:53 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Isn't that interesting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Very interesting indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. We need a front organization to get Prop 19 on every state ballot in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I would go more for ballot measures that make abortion decisions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 08:48 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Hell, do both... but the MJ issue is one that will definitely get a greater % of young people out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 10:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Get funding from the soft drink and snack industries and maybe fast food! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazylikafox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. No, abortion amendments just bring out the fundies. MJ will bring out the young people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
22. who gives a fuck about prop 19. It was prop 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 that mattered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:13 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
25. From where I'm sitting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CommonSensePLZ (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
26. Yay! Callie's pro-sobriety! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
27. A whole lot of nice people voted yes on H8, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:39 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I disagree with you on the initiative process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Don't forget that Humboldt growers have been... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
36. Maybe because there are a lot more important issues out there than legal pot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
37. I was under the impression that some of the top MJ advocates were not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-04-10 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
39. The medical marijuana industry voted down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC