Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Long, Tim Geithner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:30 AM
Original message
So Long, Tim Geithner
CNBC: So Long, Tim Geithner
by Chris in Paris on 11/04/2010 09:07:00 AM


He's survived so far but will the election results force the issue? Outside of the White House, it's hard to find anyone who was impressed with the financial regulation, which still lags behind the FDR regulation.

There will be heavy pressure from within the Democratic party for the Obama administration to make changes that will both publicly mark a change of direction for the administration and privately send a message to party insiders that the White House is accepting its share of the blame for the loss of the House of Representatives.

Geithner is a clear candidate to play the fall-guy. In exit polls, six in 10 voters said the economy is the nation's No.1 problem. Around four in 10 believe their family's financial condition got worse since Obama took office. Geithner is the nation's chief economic official. A large share of the blame for last night's results will likely fall on him.

Geithner outlasted many other economic advisers to the president, including Peter Orzsag, Herb Allison, Steve Rattner, Larry Summers and Christina Romer. Insiders say the role he played in getting Congress to pass the financial reform bill has significantly strengthened his position in the administration.


http://www.americablog.com/2010/11/cnbc-so-long-tim-geithner.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not an economics expert
--just a consumer who pays some attention. I didn't think Geithner was that bad. Am I wrong?

So why are you against him? What specifically makes you think he should be the fall guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bookmarking this just in case you get an answer. I haven't seen a good one yet.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He's not a fall guy; he was the hireling of the architects of the collapse.
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 09:57 AM by snot
This is one of the areas a lot of people got upset with Obama about -- that up until the appt of Liz Warren, which Obama seemed to agree to only reluctantly, his ENTIRE economic team consisted of the guys who LITERALLY engineered the causes of the economic crisis, and NONE of the people who warned against what was happening. (More info at http://c-cyte.blogspot.com/2009/01/naomi-klein-aka-cassandra-on-obamas.html .)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. so therefore
he should be the fall guy?

thanx for link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Got a better idea? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I just meant, I'd like to see him & all his masters OUT of the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. obama picked him, therefore he's rotten. it's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. 'Cause the entire team did a crappy job
Edited on Thu Nov-04-10 12:50 PM by jeff47
The problem is the entire economic team did a bad job. Reportedly, they were ideologically opposed to more stimulus spending. So they never presented more stimulus spending as a 'good idea' to the President. That would have been the best way to mitigate the losses in the election.

Secondly, Geithner and the rest of the senior economic team have consistently resisted attempts to crack down on Wall Street and the banks. While that wouldn't have fixed the economy, it would have been a very helpful symbol for the election.

Third, China. Geithner has been resisting attempts to get China to stop manipulating it's currency. That hurts our economy, and only really helps the offshoring cartel.

But mostly, he should go 'cause "running the economy" is his job, and the economy's still in the shitter and not really getting better. Whether that's his fault or not, it's his job to fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. k & r
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC