Michiko Kakutani's review of the Bush boy book won't be the last word, of course, but she picks up on what is an "interesting" point (as Bush would say) about Bush as president that should sit very uncomfortably on the minds of the wingers with the charge of rescuing his legacy to keep. The man (as we on the left knew when he wasn't even a gleam in the party's eye as candidate for governor, let alone president, was and remains a noodley, non-starting, wishy-washy, waste of space. Good luck making a hero out of your big fat zero, bagnuts!
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/books/04book.html?hpw=&pagewanted=all...
Several times in the book
Mr. Bush uses the term “blindsided” to describe his feelings about a crisis that his advisers and cabinet seem not to have filled him in on. He says he felt “blindsided” over Abu Ghraib: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld “had told me the military was investigating reports of abuse at the prison, but
I had no idea how graphic or grotesque the photos would be,” he writes. “The first time I saw them was the day they were aired on ‘60 Minutes II.’ ”Mr. Bush says he told advisers he “never wanted to be blindsided like that again,” after a showdown between the White House and the Justice Department over a secret surveillance program. And he says “we were
blindsided by a financial crisis that had been more than a decade in the making”: his focus, he writes, “had been kitchen-table economic issues like jobs and inflation.
I assumed any major credit troubles would have been flagged by the regulators or rating agencies.”
...
Despite the eagerness of Mr. Bush to portray himself as a forward-leaning, resolute leader,
this volume sometimes has the effect of showing the former president as both oddly passive and strangely cavalier.For instance Mr. Bush writes about the failures to contain deteriorating security conditions in Iraq, continuing fights between the Pentagon and State Department, and his frustrations with Mr. Rumsfeld. But while he says that he had “planned to make a change at Defense as part of a new national security team” in 2004, he adds that
he simply couldn’t come up with a replacement for Mr. Rumsfeld.He considered and rejected the ideas of putting Ms. Rice or Senator Joseph I. Lieberman in the job, and was rebuffed by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, who “was enjoying his retirement.”
...
And so Mr. Rumsfeld stayed on in the job until an old friend of Mr. Bush’s from high school and college (whom he had appointed to the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board) suggested Robert M. Gates as a replacement. “Why hadn’t I thought of Bob?” Mr. Bush wonders.
...