Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is some confusion on DU and everywhere else about the term "liberal."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:35 PM
Original message
There is some confusion on DU and everywhere else about the term "liberal."
There are two types of "liberalism" in America - neo-liberalism, and left-liberalism, and they are two VERY different things.

I'm not going to push links here, but if this doesn't ring a bell to you, Google is your friend.

America is a thoroughly neo-liberal country, but not a left-liberal one, and this is causing some serious ongoing confusion.

We really should fix this. Without being clear about the difference, we're vulnerable to a lot of misinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. don't push labels onto people you have no clue about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hehe, what?
Where did I push a label on anyone?

These terms exist, and they have meanings. No one's pushing anything on you. I'm just suggesting people find out what these terms actually mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't help that Rush and Faux both push the meme that....

ANY type of liberalism or progressiveism is "evil."

They've co-opted and distorted words and phrases since the late 80's/early 90's.

Other than that, I hear you and agree it would be helpful for reasonable people to understand the difference.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's because Democrats allowed Republicans to shape, define, and frame the debate,
alway putting the Democrats on defense. To most Americans perception is everything yet Democrats acted like it didn't matter. Big mistake and it had better change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I absolutely agree. They've controlled the message for 30 years. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You got it.
As long as they are allowed to frame the debate and control the dialogue, everything's going to be twisted completely, and all to their benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. The US also has a unique species of liberals
They want the checks they write to 'charity' to be on recycled paper



We used to call them Latte or Limo Liberals, but I can't remember if we can still say that here
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't know what "we say here," but I hear you.
Latte liberals burn me up. Can't stomach them at all. If your idea of "progressivism" is reaching down from your McMansion to help "the unfortunates," GTFO. That's not anything to do with the left, it's just feel-good capitalism. U.G. Krishnamurti said it best:

"Charity is the filthiest invention of the human mind: first you steal what belongs to everyone; then you use the policeman and the atom bomb to protect it. You give charity to prevent the have-nots from rebelling against you. It also makes you feel less guilty. All do-gooders feel 'high' when they do good."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alanquatermass Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Love that friggin' quotation, Naturyl! I guess my only question is...
-- what are some examples of "authentic" Liberalism (read: Leftism)? For instance, I have always considered myself a "real" Liberal and not (to use your phrase) a "Latte Liberal"... as well as a true Leftist, but maybe I'm not one. But how the hell can I tell?

Is there (and I am not being facetious here) any kind of test or quiz or questionaire I can take that would clear this up?

Danky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm not going to try to answer that without knowing you
But neo-liberals are pretty close to what we would call "libertarians" in today's political climate. They are capitalists and individualists first and foremost. Left-liberals usually accept capitalism but want to reform it, whereas those self-identifying as "leftists" (rather than liberals) often do not accept capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alanquatermass Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Got it! And very cogently expressed, too!
So, which one are you, Naturyl? (And, just as importantly, which one am I?)

I would love to reject Capitalism -- just obliterate the motherfucker -- but of course this begs the question of, What the HELL do we replace it with?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. For almost half the country liberal = Socialist...
Never mind the fact that the two political ideologies are not all that compatible, though liberalism, socialism, and conservatism all grew out of the Enlightenment, Industrial Revolution, and the political revolutions of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Indeed, and thanks.
The irony of the "liberal = socialist" claim is that neither neo-liberalism OR left-liberalism is any friend of socialism. Socialism is something else entirely and really has little patience for liberalism of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Their only concern was to demonize not to achieve accuracy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. The term neo-liberalism generally refers to economic policies,
and should not be confused with liberal political policies.

Neo-liberalism is about free markets, limited government and deregulation, i.e. the wild-eyed fantasies of libertarians and teabaggers.

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Your distinction is useful but misses out on a third usage of the word.
The right and for the most part the corporate media use "liberal" to mean "the left," which can be defined in highly variable ways that include moderate and even conservative views.

In this third sense, liberal is an attack word attached to anything the right wing pleases to call liberal.

Then there's history. Forget about it! Economically it originally referred to free market ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yep, all true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Most obvious solution
The "neo-liberals" can start calling themselves Republicans again. As they are not Liberals, and there is nothing "new" (neo) about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. A lot of terminology
The repugs really started with the liberal term after they kicked the moderates out of the Neo conservative christian Republican Party. They voted for the civil voting rights act and were kicked to the curb. It was stated they were too Liberal and socialist leaning.This was to make sure they stayed out and anybody with any other point of view need not apply. Now you can take History and word and use intellect,but talk to your Grandparents if you have them. You will find an abundance of History and the average thought process of those times. When you go back too far in History you lose today's audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Poll after poll shows the Americans consider outsourcing and free trade deals to be a problem
Neoliberals favor globalization. And you better believe that the neoliberals of both parties are gearing up to push more "free trade" on us, justifying it by claiming the election results prove that America is a center right country. Even though more "free trade" is the last thing most Americans want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC