Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a hunch why businesses were so hesitant about reporting their health care costs to the IRS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:02 AM
Original message
I have a hunch why businesses were so hesitant about reporting their health care costs to the IRS
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 07:31 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.portfolio.com/business-news/2010/11/03/businesses-get-the-house-they-wanted

by Kent Hoover Nov 03 2010

<snip>Republicans have vowed to repeal and replace health care reform, but that’s not going to happen as long as President Barack Obama wields his veto pen and Democrats hold a majority in the Senate, where they could hold up any such action.

Instead, expect another effort to repeal one provision in the new law that has made small businesses furious: a requirement that businesses file 1099 forms any time they spend more than $600 a year with another business. Small businesses complain this dramatic expansion of the 1099 requirement, which is intended to make sure businesses report all the income they’re supposed to, will create a paperwork nightmare if it goes into effect as scheduled in 2012. Democrats concede the provision must at least be modified to reduce its burden, so there’s a chance Congress could take up this matter in the lame-duck session.


----------------------------------------------------------------

I believe it is because lot of employers are actually making money off their employees health care insurance benefit programs.

And they can't have us knowing that every time they raise their employees premiums they are actually making money off of them.

Its a big scam.

They can lie to us but they can't lie to the IRS. And when we received our 1099 they wouldn't be able to lie to us anymore either.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Probably Something To That, Sir
Every 'small business' owner of my acquaintance has fudged the books one way or another....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. There's worse in this Bill: It provides that if you want to avoid
the paperwork nightmare, you can pay all your bills by credit card and the credit card company will file all the paperwork for you. I wonder how that little provision got into the Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand this. I have always had to file a 1099 form with
companies that were non-incorporated if I spent more than $600.00 with them.

If I used contract labour to keep out my landscaping and they were not incorporated, I had to issue a 1099 to the company at the end of the year.

That would mean, instead of 2-3 1099's a year, I could be issuing 200-300 1099's a year. It doesn't make sense. It would be a snow storm of paperwork for the IRS.

And no, I never made money off my employess health care insurance benefits program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. See my post above. This will be a boon to the credit card companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It will still create a nightmare for the IRS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Did any insurance carriers ever offer to kick back some of your employees premiums back to you?
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 08:04 AM by NNN0LHI
Even though you never did it was it ever suggested to you that you could do that by anyone? Anyone meaning your accountant, tax consultant, insurance writer or anyone?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, they were too busy hiking rates after Jebbles and Bill Nelson
destroyed the insurance exchange set up by Walkin' Lawton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. My father in-law who used to own his construction company used to get free trips to Vegas
He would get so many free trips he used to pass them out to his friends. He couldn't go on them all.

Ever get any offers like that from any insurance providers?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. All kinds of salespeople offer stuff like that
I get golfing trips to Florida from my printer salesman.

I still don't see how that would appear on a 1099.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. How about your insurance providers?
Do they do the same thing?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. How should I know? I'm not in HR. But even if they are, how would this change that?
If the insurance rep is giving trips to Vegas to my HR person, he'll have to give the company I work for a 1099. Not me. I'd still not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. No, no and no. Just a 25% to 40% rate hike with a note that they
held premium increases to 15%, or what I call the "we're lying, what do you think you can do about it". Thank you, former insurance commissioner Bill Nelson.

Actually, any trips that I might have gotten went to Senator Bill Nelson after he dismantled the Florida insurance exchanges. He got 1.5 million for his senate run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. my wife and i fudged a lot when we had our business
one part was cash only and the other was taxable. we survived the 80`s doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demstud Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Care to explain how that would work?
I'm not sure I'm buying your hypothesis. You should give some evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Only evidence would be the information printed out on our 1099
And the companies want to continue withholding that evidence from the workers.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. 1099s are not for employees. By definition.
Employees cannot get a 1099; they can get a W2. If your employer is keeping you in 1099 status, you can file a complaint with the department of labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ummm... no
1099 on businesses is actually a huge paperwork nightmare. So lets say I go to Staples and I buy a $601 printer. I have to file a 1099 on that. It's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. This is about health care costs not printers
How much of a nightmare can it be to show how much the employer is paying for his health care for their employees?

Doesn't seem like them much of a big deal to me.

Unless they were trying to hide something that is. Then I could see how it would be a nightmare for some employers.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. No, it's about raising revenue
It's a double-check on income for corporations. If there are 500 companies who submit 1099s for $1000 payments made to ABC company, and ABC company tries to report income of only $30,000 rather than $50,000+, then that will red-flag the return for the IRS to further scrutinize.

The previous set-up presumed that incorporated companies would have accounting practices in place that honestly report income.

But yes, it is going to be a big pain in the ass if I have to get a Tax ID number for every company I do business with during the year. It may have something of a chilling effect on spending, too, or at least comparison shopping. "I can save $40 if I buy this printer from XYZ, but I'll have to spend time tracking down their tax ID and filing a 1099 for them. Guess I'll stick with ABC... or just do without."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. No, this is about printers. If you spend more than $600 with a vendor you'll have to file a 1099
And I could do with reforming that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think you're mixing up two provisions
This is about a provision that vendors will have to start getting 1099s (this is about getting taxes from the people and businesses your business gives money to).

There is a separate provision that will require W2s starting next year to disclose the amount spent on health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. No. This is a complete pain in the ass.
I have a small business and I spend more than $600 with around 100 businesses a year. Court reporters, hotels, car rental, restaurants, office supplies, cleaning lady, etc. At the end of the year I have to track each of them down and get their tax id's? Fuck you very much. Assuming it takes about half an hour each, that is...50 hours. I would much rather spend that time drunk.

And tax ids are very much like social security numbers. Imagine the identity theft. If you have a small company's tax id and a check from them then getting checks printed is easy.

This is the stupidest thing they have done in Washington since deciding to invade Iraq. And I make no money off health insurance. How? Kickbacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. This is the crap that makes people call us "anti-business" NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Maybe if a HUGH!1 number of small businesses didn't cheat on their taxes,
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 01:45 AM by kath
such measures to try to document their REAL income wouldn't be necessary.

Not at all saying that YOU do this, but surely you realize that many businesses, large and small, do all sorts of cheating. Cash transactions, two sets of books, etc.
The one that REALLY pisses me off is the rampant misclassification of employees as independent contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Does that piss you off more than
the despicable gang of warmongers that are spending Americas treasure drone bombing wedding and funeral parties?

1
2
3
4
5

Count to 5. Your government just spent $10,000 of your grandchildrens money fighting wars 8,000 miles away from you.

http://costofwar.com/

But some are "really pissed" at employees tax status.

Most Americans deserve exactly what they have bought. Some of us are stuck (for now) on the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC