I'll take Obama's commmitment seriously when he leads by example.
Obama isn't too much into nuclear disarmament when his administration asks Congress for over $7 billion for nuclear weapons for 2011, an increase of $624 million. Obama has eclipsed Bush in military spending including Nuclear Arms.
"I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons and seeks a world without them. And seek to reduce our stockpiles and launchers."
BARACK OBAMA
Ronald Reagan huh?
"The budget for new and modified nuclear weapons is increasing on President Obama's watch. We will call on the government to stop funding the continued development of nuclear bombs and to, instead, use the monies to meet human needs, including the irreversible dismantlement of U.S. nuclear warheads and immediate cleanup of the radioactive and toxic wastes at Livermore Lab and other locations contaminated by nuclear weapons. ...
"We will demand that the United States live up to its disarmament obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). We will forcefully point out that the present scheme to spend $180 billion to build new bomb plants and new nuclear bombs under the rubric of 'modernization' is not only out of compliance with the NPT, but is also morally and fiscally bankrupt."
MARYLIA KELLEY, executive director of Tri-Valley CAREs (Communities Against a Radioactive Environment) located in Livermore, California
"When President Obama called for a world without nuclear weapons in Prague last year, the world cheered and he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Which will it be, President Obama, nuclear disarmament or nuclear buildup? You can't have it both ways."
JOHN STEINBACH, Hiroshima/Nagasaki Peace Committee of the National Capital Area