Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Indefinitely suspended without pay" for not telling the boss?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:18 PM
Original message
"Indefinitely suspended without pay" for not telling the boss?
Isn't that a bit draconian?

It might be more fitting if the rule forbids donations altogether but...for not telling the boss? What's the difference if the boss knows how you spend your money? Authoritarianism gone wild!

I call bullshit political purge. I'm boycotting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. For not getting "permission" which is worse.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. loony tunes!
I think I am going to boycott my local grocery store cause they don't allow the check out bagger to fling buggers while he packs my groceries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, a bit. Considering the money involved
It's not like it violated Olbermann's on air personality or behavior. He's been pushing democratic candidates for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'd say not so much pushing Democratic candidates as
exposing bad right wing candidates and their propagandists. I suppose that implies favoring Democratic candidates.

Whatever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're right, the end of "Worst Persons" was prob. a predicate
to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Very interesting suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digitaln3rd Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, you're right.
You shouldn't have to disclose to your boss when a journalist is donating to political candidates while going on the air and delivering the news about an election that involves that candidate.

Riiiight.

If this was Hannity or Beck who got suspended for donating to a candidate and not disclosing it, you'd all be cheering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Then why aren't donations by reporters and commentators banned altogether?
If they're such a bad idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Depends on the contract
They can't be "banned" by law, that crosses into constitutional freedom of speech. That said, any news organization has every right to set their own ethical standards for the reporters, commentators, etc. that they hire. Just like each of those journalists can decide whether to sign the contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That may be.
But it looks to me like such a policy is saying that it's okay to shoot the sheriff as long as you tell the mayor. The big crime is not the shooting but in not telling the mayor. It's absurd policy and it looks like a bullshit excuse to can him for political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's Called Honoring A Contract...
I'm waiting to hear or read Keith's side of this situation before jumping up and down. Many high profile news people are prohibited in their oontracts from having any financial ties, including contributions, to politicians or to disclose such possible conflicts. IF Keith did contribute without disclosing and this provision is in his deal his employer has the right to suspend or even terminate.

Ironically, Keith banished Richard Wolfe for a while when his conflicts of interest came to light but once things cooled down he's returned to the show. From what I'm reading...and it's preliminary at best...this is a suspension, not some massive conspiracy. Let's get more information before getting out the torches and pitchforks (and the cynic in me says most will piss and moan on a message board but do little else).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Indefinite" does not mean "long-term."
It means "indefinite." Nobody's defined it yet.

KO could probably show sufficient remorse by Monday to be on-air then.

I think it likely that his lawyers are talking to their lawyers about how to make it happen.

First, of course, the laywers must determine the precise wording necessary to present exactly the proper degree of deeply felt, genuine, heart-felt remorse necessary and to work out exactly the time, place, and modality in which to spontaneously express the agreed upon deeply felt remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. David Shuster is also on "indefinite" suspension. Seen him lately? -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mother may I or simon says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is typical of tyrannical American employement.
Even many DUers agree that almighty employers have an absolute right to control your personal life.

This isn't new. I mean, they've been confiscating your frigging *bodily fluids* for years and few of you felt it was a problem.

Land of the free? Haha, don't make me bust a kidney. Not much of a "land of the free" when the majority of waking life is spent under the total control of autocratic leaders in the workplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC