Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matt Taibbi on Olbermann

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:16 PM
Original message
Matt Taibbi on Olbermann
Olbermann Suspension is Lunacy


Just quickly: I just found out about the suspension of Keith Olbermann for making political contributions. NBC apparently has some policy prohibiting journalists from donating to candidates, so they suspended him indefinitely without pay.

I went online and read the news and found the inevitable commentary by ostensible experts on journalistic ethics, who are all lining up to whale on Olbermann. One quote I found in this Bloomberg piece:

"Journalists who work for a news organization have an ethical responsibility to honor their guidelines and standards,” said Bob Steele who teaches journalism ethics at Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Florida. “If NBC and MSNBC spelled out those guidelines clearly and Olbermann violated those guidelines, then he should pay the price."

He should pay the price? Is Bob Steele kidding? What the hell is wrong with people?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/matt-taibbi/blogs/TaibbiData_May2010/231499/83512
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. That journalism teacher may not be aware, but there are no more real journalists
They are over paid stenographers reciting the lies they are told to say.

Olbermann's was an opinion show, he was fairly upfront about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I found this comment on Huffington Post.................
"Keith has a solid legal ground. Please note that your employee handbook is not the law. The court is not obligated to accept it if it impedes your constitutional rights. As CEO of a 501 3 C NPO you learn that any provisions in your employee handbook do not constitute statutory law if not construed as the law. The law says that, as a 501 C 3, the organization cannot push people to support a certain candidate. However, employees have the right to exercise their free speech as long as their intention is not to influence others within the organization. There are many cases that we can cite where the USJ has ruled organizations suppressing free speech.

There is nothing like suspension indefinitely. There is fired. The MSNBC President has had several run –in with Keith and wants to payback but in a wrong way – using an unconstitutional internal policy. MSNBC better correct the problem ASAP."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. They did it to Dan Rather in 2004, they will do it to KO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Olbermann is going to emerge stronger because of this.
You know it. I know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. So where are the Legal Eagles and Constitutional
Edited on Fri Nov-05-10 10:56 PM by madmax
Scholars, the Contract Law specialists to take this 'contract' apart and bring it before a court and make a case.

:shrug: We can all piss and moan about it but, if it's precedent, settled case law or whatever there's jack shit anyone can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. If my newscaster's corporate employer dictates how my
newscaster exercises his First Amendment rights, why should I trust either the newscaster or the corporate employer.

Corporate employers need to separate themselves from the news staff.

The news should be entirely independent from the ideological, business or personal concerns of a broadcast corporation.

The news is supposed to be a public service, not an ad, not an ideological statement by the corporation itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC