The health situation in Japan after World War II was extremely poor. However, in less
than 35 years the country’s life expectancy was the highest in the world. Japan’s continuing
health gains are linked to policies established at the end of World War II by the Allied occupation
force that established a democratic government.
The Confucian principles that existed in Japan long before the occupation but were preempted
during the war years were reestablished after the war, facilitating subsequent health improvements.
Japan’s good health status today is not primarily the result of individual health behaviors or the
country’s health care system; rather, it is the result of the continuing economic equality that
is the legacy of dismantling the prewar hierarchy.
(Am J Public Health. 2008;98:589–594. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.116012)
In the late 1860s, the Meiji Restoration in Japan dismantled the feudal Tokugawa Empire. A
reasonable standard of living existed in the country from the 17th through the 19th centuries,
with relatively small disparities between the ruling Samurai class and commoners.14,15 There was
a focus on education during the Tokugawa period, when Japan’s literacy rates were comparable to those of many European countries...
As Japan industrialized beginning in the late 1890s, powerful families called zaibatsu (including
the Mitsubishi, Mitsui, and Sumitomo families) established themselves as corporate-like entities.
They amassed great wealth and political control and dominated Japanese society. Income inequality
increased dramatically leading up to World War II.18 The zaibatsu influenced political and military
leaders, creating fear of United States hegemony in the region and pushing for militarism in the
Pacific. Entitlements declined and the central government did not attempt to redistribute resources. Japanese health and longevity suffered greatly during the zaibatsu reign and the war years subsequent to the Meiji renaissance according to vital statistics records from the period, which are widely believed to be accurate...
****Summary****
The paper goes on to detail reforms instituted by the Occupation, particularly land reform & the breakup of the zaibatsu, then goes on:
Crawford F. Sams, director of the Public Health and Welfare Section under MacArthur, noted
Japan’s astounding health gains during and after the period of the Allied occupation:
"Between the years 1895 and
1946, the life expectancy of
Japanese men remained stationary
at 42.8 years. The life expectancy
for women during the
same period was increased only
from 44.3 to 51.1 years.
But between the years 1946 and
1951 the life expectancy at
birth for males took an astounding
jump from 42.8 to 60.8 years, and that for women
increased from 51.1 to 64.8."
He went on to describe this phenomenon as “unequaled in any country in the world in medical
history in a comparable period of time..."
Johansson and Mosk reported that after the war life expectancy rose at a pace unprecedented in
both Japanese and world history. This increase occurred “despite the fact that income per head had
not yet returned to pre-war levels..."
CONCLUSION
Today’s huge health gap between Japan and the United States could not be bridged even by eradicating heart disease, the leading cause of death in the United States.47 Moreover, the United States continues to fall further behind, ranking 21st in life expectancy in the 1992 United Nations report48 and 30th in 2004 (& most recently 44th or something like that).
The discrepancy between the two countries may result from Japan not experiencing
the levels of income inequality and wealth polarization found in the United States in recent
decades. Changes in a society’sChanges in a society’s economic
hierarchy can have profound health effects, and Japan’s example is remarkable. The Allied
occupation provided Japan with the opportunity to establish a democratic, peaceful, and
relatively economically egalitarian society. The country’s economic recovery was aided by a
new constitution facilitated by Japanese values. These structural changes produced social
conditions conducive to health and longevity, and the benefits of an increasing life span continue.
http://depts.washington.edu/eqhlth/pages/BezruchkaJapan_08.pdfFor more on equality & health, here's a recent lecture in seattle. click on the first link here, "Watch the town hall jan 8th"
http://depts.washington.edu/eqhlth/It's interesting that MacArthur/the Occupation was very consciously trying to "create a middle class". So the conditions which do this are evidentally quite well-known in policy circles, & have been for some time.
Thus we might conclude that the conditions which destroy middle classes are also well known, & if broad-based prosperity is declining, that is in some sense a conscious policy choice as well.