Media Matters: The GOP civil war will be televised

[babylonsister]

http://mediamatters.org/columns/201011050030

Media Matters: The GOP civil war will be televised
November 05, 2010 3:17 pm ET


Everything on Election Day went pretty much as expected. Republicans are up, Democrats are down, and Dick Morris once again looks like a fool. But as big as Tuesday was politically, it lacked, as have past midterms, a feeling of punctuation. No sooner had the House changed hands than speculation began on 2012 Republican presidential candidates. This is in large part due to the obsessive political media (GOP pollster Rasmussen has already polled the likely matchups). One election cycle ends, and the next immediately begins.

And while we're still about 14 months from the first votes being cast in the 2012 elections, we're nonetheless going to get a protracted and dramatic look at the selection process for the Republican nomination. All we have to do is switch on Fox News.

The Murdoch network currently has on its payroll no fewer than four right-wingers whose names consistently pop up in discussions of President Obama's putative GOP challengers: Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee. Fox also frequently hosts former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, whose name has been tossed around as a dark-horse candidate. As the election cycle coverage heats up, Fox will be forced to make some awkward choices in how it covers the campaigns of their colleagues.

And the trouble has already begun.

While not a candidate himself, Fox News' Karl Rove will be a key player in the 2012 GOP primaries, largely through his Wall Street-funded Republican piggy bank, American Crossroads. One can speculate as to which candidate he prefers, but one doesn't have to guess who he doesn't want to challenge Obama -- Fox News' Sarah Palin.

The feud between these two has been simmering since Palin injected herself into the Republican primaries of various Senate campaigns and helped Tea Party candidates snatch nominations from more electable Republicans, only to see them lose in the general election (see: Sharron Angle and, if trends hold, Joe Miller.)

snip//

Fox's past response to their (many) ethical lapses has been to pretend that nothing's wrong. But this is a bigger breach of journalistic ethics than anything they've done before, and whether they can continue to play dumb remains to be seen.

But one thing's for sure: The road to the 2012 Republican presidential nomination runs right through Fox News.

[Waiting For Everyman]

1. K&R

[tanyev]

2. I'm ready!

:popcorn:

[madokie]

3. So true

Fox needs to be stopped, if we don't stop them we'll all lose

[OHdem10]

4. It works for them. and the Republican Party.,so what is their incentive

to change.

Not saying this right, just how things are.

[SalmonChantedEvening]

5. The GOP schism has already started here in PA.

Mike Fitzpatrick has been served notice that the Teabaggers will be watching his every vote.

By late 2011 he may be wishing Patrick Murphy had won.

[Supersedeas]

6. not GOP schism is so big that money and promises to cooshy Big Govt appointments can fix

[Scurrilous]

7. K & R

:thumbsup: