Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So How Do We Get Cable TV NEWS REGULATED...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:10 PM
Original message
So How Do We Get Cable TV NEWS REGULATED...



....So the ILK CALLED FOXNEWS cannot raise money for political candidates with out first changing their description of their content from NEWS to POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE....... And I think the rest of cable news should be held tothe same standard...


Got to Stop this CRAP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apply the fairness doctrine?
I am not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The fairness doctrine...
...was justified on the grounds that the RF spectrum was a publicly-held commons, and its use could be regulated in the public good the same way the water of the Colorado River can, or the fish off the coast of New England.

Cable isn't like that. It's not 'the public airwaves'. There are no 'public airwaves' on cable. All those transmissions dance around in the 1/4 of an inch between the center conductor and the shield of a piece of RG-59 coax (mostly). Which cable someone paid for, paid to lay, pays the pole fees for, pays the towns' franchise fees, etc.

Me, I'm a socialist -- I'd have the hardware publicly owned, as a utility. But I wouldn't regulate the content. Because "Congress shall make no law...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do you reconcile...
...fighting for net neutrality and for regulation of cable news based on content?

I'm guessing you don't bother -- it's just more of HULK SMASH! progressivism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ya can't unfortunately
Cable channels are considered private business sice it is a basic subscription package. And don't bother going after the providers, market is too big to be sadly honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. With the First Amendment, likely impossible
The only way to attack it is to convince as many as possible of the public in general that they don't buy into it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, that pesky First Amendment raises its ugly head again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. First you would have to get Cable TV regulated
which it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. There's something in the Constitution about Free Speech that would get in the way of that.
For that matter I think their might be a Free Speech issue involved with Keith's suspension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fox isn't a news organization, it's the propaganda wing of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. News USED to be under a different set of rules and was a "public service"

It was considered to be a main reason why the airwaves were "free".

A while back the "news divisions" were lumped in with the "entertainment" divisions...They were expected to "pay for themselves" & that's when they also shrank & became loaded up with commercials & "faux" news to appeal to a broader audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC