|
I favor keeping the taxcuts for people making under $200,000 (single)/$250,000 (couples) and going back to Clinton era rates for those making above. That's my position, and don't forget that.
All this talk of compromise is laughable. To me, the compromise was that we would not repeal the taxcuts in the stimulus last year; they would be allowed to expire and be in effect for one more year. So I view the current talk as capitulation, not compromise.
But having said that, there is a right way and a wrong way to capitulate. Make the taxcuts permanent for those making below $200/$250, and grant a two year exemption for those making above that. Then in the thick of an election year, Republicans (who will surely want those taxcuts extended again and again) will be left having to defend cutting taxes for the rich and only the rich. That would be a debate we would want to have. Is is bad fiscal policy? Yes, it is, and that's why my position is what I stated above. But so be it.
The worst thing they could do would be a two year waiver for all tax brackets because then we would be having this same losing debate two years from now, and middle class tax rates would be tied to tax cuts for the rich. Not good in an election year.
|