Glenn Greenwald: The self-absorption of America's ruling class

[meegbear]

This morning we have a living, breathing embodiment of America's political culture and its ruling class: a prototypical featured article in Politico by Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei which "reports" on the widespread anger at President Obama from -- as they put it -- "virtually every group that matters in American politics." Who, to Politico, are the only groups that matter in American politics? "Congressional Democrats. . . Democratic state party leaders . . . . Democratic lobbyists . . . business leaders . . . Republicans." And of what does this "reporting" consist? A bunch of petulant, cowardly royal court functionaries -- hiding as always behind "journalistic" anonymity -- whining in Politico about a series of petty ceremonial slights. That's what makes this article such a perfect exhibit of our self-absorbed political culture, and this article will undoubtedly shape much cable news chatter for today at least.

With a massive unemployment crisis, millions of foreclosures, rampant elite lawlessness and plundering, and pervasive, severe anxiety over America's decline, this is what the "groups that matter in American politics" are anonymously complaining about:

- In July, Obama was visiting GM and Chrysler plans in the Detroit area and invited the local House member - but other Democratic lawmakers who stood to benefit from the exposure were left in the cold.

- When Obama was giving the commencement address in the University of Michigan's "Big House" stadium last May, he mingled in the home-team locker room with university deans and regents. Across the tunnel, in the visitor’s locker room, several members of Michigan’s Democratic congressional delegation -- including Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin and House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. -- waited patiently.

Some had brought grandchildren so they could get their picture taken with the president. But they never got to see him. Obama didn't cross the tunnel to see the lawmakers.

- In June, during an East Room reception for top supporters at Ford's Theatre, several of the attendees were disappointed that they didn’t get to shake the president's hand and take a photo, as they had in the past. Instead, Obama greeted a few people down front, reaching over a rope line.

"People thought they were going to a reception with the president, not a campaign event," one attendee recalled.

- One veteran Democrat recalled a group of Obama donors who were chatting at last December’s State Department holiday party, hosted by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "Half of them were upset because they had not been invited to a White House party," this Democrat recalled. "The (other) half was upset because they had been invited to the White House, and were kept behind a rope line instead of getting to greet the president."

- The president invited Senate chairs and ranking members over for dinner in March 2009, but came in after they were seated and went back to the residence without shaking hands or visiting each table. . . .

Other executives complained that Obama did not do enough outreach, even after the friction became clear. And executives who did get an audience complain that he is too often behind a podium, not doing the off-the-record question-and-answer sessions that would make them feel more involved and maybe promote understanding between the two sides.

There, ladies and gentlemen, is the mentality of the "groups that matter in American politics." That's what these people are worried about and focused on. Some of the anti-Obama grievances cited by Politico are marginally less trivial though still on the level of political process complaints (rhetorical and communication failures on the part of the White House). But almost all of them are voiced anonymously. That Wall Street and other financial executives have spent the last year petulantly complaining about how unfairly they are treated -- as their wealth continues to boom while the rest of the population suffers -- was, in my view, one of the year's most vivid expressions of the degradation of America's political culture. That "the groups that matter" are preoccupied with these sorts of prerogative-denying slights -- while Politico gives them front-page anonymity to whine about those grievances -- is definitely another. We have the country we have because of the character of the people who run it.

<snip>

http://www.salon.com/news/politico/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/11/08/politico

[creon]

1. Got it in one

petulant. stamping of feet. pouting.

Speaks to a determined refusal to face facts.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

2. Reminds me of something...

[Luminous Animal]

8. I'm glad someone understood Glenn's point.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

12. Me, too.

[socialshockwave]

3. Sounds like..

The President is acting like his Republicrat predecessors - an elitist.

If you aren't out there in the thick of it, greeting the people and getting them to rally around you like a TRUE populist - then you're just asking for them to feel resentment and even outright hatred for you.

[JDPriestly]

5. He is repeating the Bush mistake. The attitude in D.C. is "Let them eat cake."

[Luminous Animal]

9. The article isn't about Obama and the people. It's about the insularity of the political class.

[JDPriestly]

4. You have to see the movie, Inside Job, to understand how that

mentality, the narcissistic preoccupations of the "leaders" of our country have ruined not just our economy but that of the world. It's incredible.

[dgibby]

6. Haven't heard of it.

Is it online? I'd love to see it.

[JDPriestly]

7. Review from Boston.com (Don't know this website, personally)

Anger is an underrated response to a movie — not to be mad at a film, but to be mad with it. Charles Ferguson’s documentary “Inside Job,’’ about the recent financial catastrophe, is infuriating the way the best nonfiction filmmaking can be. The movie succeeds at upsetting you not by losing its cool, the way so many similar films do, but by slow-cooking its argument. Most of the film is focused on Manhattan. But the movie begins in Iceland the way New York disaster movies often start in a science lab, the woods, or outer space.
INSIDE JOB
Directed by: Charles Ferguson
Written by: Ferguson, Chad Beck, and Adam Bolt
At: Coolidge Corner, Kendall Square, West Newton
Running time: 109 minutes
Rated: PG-13 (some drug and sex-related material, including financial terms that sound sex-related)
This is a work of sustained, nonpartisan rage. Its anger is always simmering, never all-consuming. Ferguson knows what it is he wants to say, and the movie goes about its point-making with lawyerly precision. The result is a masterpiece of investigative nonfiction moviemaking — a scathing, outrageous, depressing, comical, horrifying report on what and who brought on the crisis.

It’s one of the rare enterprises on this subject where statistics and financial argot don’t feel like an onslaught or obscure the larger argument. Of course, at this point, “credit default swaps,’’ “subprime loans,’’ and “derivatives’’ seem like old friends. Indeed, all your favorite financial terms are mentioned. You recognize them even if you can’t understand them.

In much the same way he did in his previous film, “No End in Sight,’’ about the run-up to the Iraq war, Ferguson finds many of the key players of the crisis and many others — economists, lobbyists, journalists, a shrink, Eliot Spitzer — who have special knowledge about how it happened. Many of them sit in conference rooms, offices, and minimalist locations that seem somehow chic. Spitzer holds forth in an unfurnished space on the top floor of a tall building. I suppose a movie about money should look like a million bucks.

http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2010/10/15/inside_job_movie_review____inside_job_showtimes/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed3

Here are some more from Rotten Tomatoes:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inside_job_2010/

[dgibby]

11. Thanks so much!

I'm definitely going to see it. Can't wait!

[LoZoccolo]

10. Gleen Greenwald: automatic unrecommend n/t

[EFerrari]

13. This country reminds me of 1968 El Salvador more every day.

I was about 10 when I visited and was puzzled that there were only 3 teevee stations that all played the same thing, that rich people only talked about the latest flap at their club. It was so strange and oppressive, I couldn't wait to get back home.

If anyone had told me that forty years later "home" would be a much bigger version of 1968 El Salvador, I wouldn't have believed them.