Monday Morning Chomsky

[marmar]

"Modern industrial civilization has developed within a system of convenient myths. The driving force has been individual material gain, which is accepted as legitimate, even praiseworthy, on grounds that private vices yield public benefits in the classic formulation. It has long been understood very well that a society based on this principal will destroy itself in time. It can only persist with whatever suffering and injustice it entails as long as it is possible to pretend that the destructive forces that humans create are limited, that the world is an infinite resource and that the world is an infinite garbage can. At this stage in history one of two things is possible. Either the general population will take control of its own destiny and will concern itself with community interests guided by values of solidarity, sympathy and concern for others or alternatively there will be no destiny for anyone to control. As long as some specialized class is in a position of authority, it is going to set policy for the special interests that it serves. But the conditions of survival, let alone justice, require rational social planning in the interests of the community as a whole and by now that means the global community. The question is whether privileged elites should dominate mass communication and should use this power as they tell us they must, namely to impose necessary illusions to manipulate and deceive the "stupid majority" and remove them from the public arena. The question in brief is whether democracy and freedom are values to be preserved or threats to be avoided. In this possibly terminal phase of human existence democracy and freedom are more than values to be treasured, they may well be essential to survival."

-- Noam Chomsky, from the documentary version of Manufacturing Consent

[el_bryanto]

1. Freedom to contribute to the community?

I don't understand exactly how Chomsky is using Freedom. Because certainly he doesn't mean the freedom of the wealthy to hold on to their property at the expense of the rest of us.

Bryant

[Gregorian]

2. Absolutely brilliant.

As I was in the shower I was thinking that we expect those who get into Congress should abandon their private interests. In fact, they more than likely get into Congress to promote their private interests, even if private means a small group.

Money flows toward power. It is a positive feedback. So they end up with more time, which allows them to run for office, which allows them to promote those who also have power.

Man, I love Chomsky. They don't let him on tv, do they.