Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama Can Create Millions of Infrastructure/Public Works Jobs by Executive Order!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:36 PM
Original message
President Obama Can Create Millions of Infrastructure/Public Works Jobs by Executive Order!
Obama: Create Jobs by Executive Order
by Jeanne Mirer and Marjorie Cohn
Jeanne Mirer, who practices labor and employment law in New York, is president of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and past president of the National Lawyers Guild.
November 8, 2010

On May 6, 1935, with the country in the midst of the Great Depression, and with indirect efforts to create jobs having not moved the needle of unemployment rates, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 7034 and appropriated $4.8 billion for the Works Progress Administration (WPA). The WPA put millions of Americans to work constructing buildings, painting murals to decorate them, and performing plays for audiences that had never before seen a dramatic production. In the process, many were saved from poverty and starvation and the economy began to revive.

Although Congress, as part of the New Deal, had appropriated money specifically for relief, FDR decided to use the money for a direct jobs program by issuing a Presidential executive order. This Executive Order described the agencies to be involved in the program, its structure and procedure for application and allocation of jobs.

The WPA was quickly implemented. By March 1936, 3.4 million people were employed and an average of 2.3 million people worked monthly until the program ended in June 1943. During its existence the WPA employed more than 8,500,000 different persons on 1,410,000 individual projects, and spent about $11 billion. The average yearly salary was $1,100, a living wage at the time. During its 8-year history, the WPA built 651,087 miles of highways, roads, and streets. It constructed, repaired, or improved 124,031 bridges, 125,110 public buildings, 8,192 parks, and 853 airport landing fields.

But, in light of the election results, is such a program possible? Can the President directly create jobs by executive order? The answer is a resounding yes. Remember when the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which created the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) was passed, one of the purposes was to preserve homeownership, and promote jobs and economic growth.

Much of the TARP money has been repaid and the administration refers to the profit on the payments. If one assumes an average cost of one job is $50,000, 6 million jobs could be immediately created for $300 billion. 12 million jobs could be created for $600 billion. Because this is already appropriated money, Congressional Republicans could not block it.

This direct job creation would be bold. It would also be highly stimulative. It would not add to the deficit because it is already appropriated money. Furthermore, one third of it would come back immediately in taxes, and more importantly, the growth in demand from this number of added jobs would expand private sector job growth and grow the overall economy.

Please read the entire article at:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/11/08#comment-1661583


-----------------------------------------------------------


The TARP money could be used to implement the United States Conference of Mayors "Economic Recovery Jobs and Infrastructure Projects" plan which alone would create 2 million important jobs and begin Congressman James Oberstar's transporatation and infrastructure proposal that would create 6 million living wage jobs.

-----------------------------------


U.S. Rep. James Oberstar, a Minnesota Democrat and chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, addressed these huge needs by introducing the Surface Transportation Authorization Act of 2009. Oberstar proposes spending $500 billion over the next six years to transform our antiquated system into the reliable, sophisticated network we need to safely and efficiently move people and goods.

The legislation would provide approximately:

•$337 billion for highway construction, including at least $100 billion to begin long-awaited repairs to our national highway system and bridges.

•$100 billion for mass transit, including $12 billion for repairs.

•$50 billion to fund 11 high-speed rail corridors linking major metropolitan areas.

The total investment would create or sustain about 6 million family-wage jobs, many here in the Midwest as our region continues to grow in importance as a transportation hub.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8736605



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toward Progress Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. He can...
...but he should wait until his second term, if possible. The R-party is currently riding on the success of their midterm fear-mongering and, unfortunately, an executive order might play into their hands. If something like this could show immediate positive results, though, through significant employment, the Rs might fail at exploiting it as something negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Welcome.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toward Progress Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you!
:) I've lurked for too long, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. "Wait until his secont term". I disagree strongly. IMO he should wait only until his SOTU
Edited on Mon Nov-08-10 07:19 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
(State of the Union) address, which should focus mainly on the economy, and rebuke Republicans sternly for obstructing job creation measures for small businesses, community banks, transportation, and other legislation often actually promoted by Republicans in the past.

IMO his SOTU should provide a sorely-needed economics lesson to the American people, pointing out how long it took to recover from past deep recessions. He should point out that, as Christina Rohmer writes in the NY Times, focusing on deficit reduction, just as Herbert Hoover did before FDR replaced him, typically is associated with dramatically lower economic growth--just what we DON'T need now. See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9508921 and http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/business/24view.html .

IMO he should pitch his Executive Order as an emergency measure that will bring one-third back in tax revenues immediately, and more than repay the rest of the investment as greater transportation efficiency and other infrastructure benefits promote future economic growth.

And, IMO, before the end of the year, he should employ reconciliation if possible to enact a bold SUBSTITUTE for a two-year renewal of extra income tax breaks for the top 2 percent. As NYU economist Nouriel Roubini has argued, renewing income tax breaks for the top 2 percent is a vastly inferior way to stimulate consumer spending and employer hiring/wage increases than small business tax breaks that go ONLY to ACTUAL small businesses that create jobs. IMO that $140 billion (of the Republicans proposed $700 billion for plutocrats over 10 years) could be leveraged into more than $1 TRILLION in extra consumer demand and MILLIONS of private-sector jobs, and not just a further unjustified shift in the income distribution toward the very wealthy who own many Republican congresspeople (see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9497641 ).

If reconciliation is not feasible during the lame-duck session, IMO letting Republicans filibuster such a proposal would set the stage for a dramatic Job Emergency Executive Order at the SOTU.

In two years, if these measures have revived the economy, the President's past boldness and responsiveness to the REAL message of the midterms IMO will catapult Democrats back into real control of every branch of governent but the judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yea, but does he have the balls to do it...
And on the other side, do the states and municipalities governed by Republicans take the money or allow the plans to be implimented...

If they do it sure would make for one hell of a fight and a very entertaining general election in 2012...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. If they refuse the funds while other states put millions to work using the funds they would have to

answer to the unemployed in their states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sadly, Oberstar is gone. A victim of the media "tea party" hype.
:(

Good to know, if true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he's powerless.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. He can't use a Presidential order, everything has to go through Congress!
:cry:

At least that's all I have heard here for 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Right. FDR could issue job creating executive orders but President Obama can't.

And besides, that would make Republicans really angry!

They'd call President Obama names!

Of course, they will call President Obama names anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Law professors and heads of legal associations disagree. See the top of the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. I don't think you read the body of my post.
It was highly sarcastic :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Many people don't get attempts at sarcasm, even when you use the red "SARCASM" emoticon
It appeared to me that your post was putting a damper on a very important thread for those many DUers who apparently only read OP titles and blue reply titles. So I posted a reminder of the source of the legal opinion about the feasibility of an Executive Order,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unrec...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Then do it and stop bullshiting around. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. That rotten Obama, just sitting on that money purposely to cause misery
:sarcasm:

Is it the 1930s again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Just sign an Executive Order for jobs. You don't agree? Is his hand broken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. In his SOTU speech, he could say: "We have a choice between accelerating job growth
on the one hand, and limiting the long term structural budget deficit on the other. My Republican opponents want to spent all ($650 billion?) of returned TARP funds on reducing the structural and the CYCLICAL deficit during a recession. That is the way of Herbert Hoover, and it shall not stand.

As POTUSA, i have been empowered by the people to decide how much of repaid TARP funds go to deficit reduction. My economic advisers tell me that only (a third?) of this year's deficit is structural--long-term--rather than cyclical--to be reversed by resumption of economic growth I hereby announce that (one third?) shall be used to reduce the structural deficit, and the rest will fund my Jobs Emergency Executive Order, which I shall sign tomorrow morning ..."

After the lame-duck session ends, President Obama need not worry anymore about placating Blue Dog Democrats and moderate Republicans to pass legislation. He knows that a Republican House and 47? filibustering Republican Senators will stymie all of his legislative initiatives.

I predict: No more Mr. Nice Guy after New Year's eve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I have a feeling that your position is twisting and exaggerating something
Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I don't know why you have that feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. But someone might call him a socialist...
:eyes:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. They call him that now! They probably think Nixon was a communist!

I don't think Obama really worries about the name calling much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. He can - but he won't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. If Dubya could trump Congress by fomenting 'war' in '03, in '11 Obama can turn himself into FDR,
bypassing Congress entirely. What a great opportunity to give voters what they really want--JOBS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
24. Now if only he had the will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Now if only he wanted to. It's not just a case of will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. According to CBO estimates, the President OUGHT to want to issue an Infrastucture EO
Congressional Budget Office extimates of the effect on output and employment of various fiscal policy options rate Infrastructure Spending as vastly superior to extending Bush-era income tax breaks. See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9518706 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. He just ought to do it, but probably won't unless Democratic leaders in Congress publicly demand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Very wise opinion. Who are the most populist Senators? Dorgan, who's retiring
this year and might want to go out with a bang? Remember, he predicted a decade ago that what Congress was deregulating on Wall Street would cause bank bailouts and financial and fiscal catastrophe.

Maybe somebody should give Dorgan a shove toward his political destiny and place in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I know that, it's just really hard to say.
There's a whole lot of things he just doesn't want to do even after he said he did want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. So what President Obama says and what he actually does are two different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. transparent agenda, much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC