Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey Tea Party People. You've been had.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:34 PM
Original message
Hey Tea Party People. You've been had.
Rand Paul was to be the hero of the Tea Party Republicans. Leader for The Tea Party in the Senate.

Tea-baggers jumped up and down and got all their white sheets in a twist. They did everything possible to secure a stomping victory.



Now once the votes are in and once the title is soon to be placed, Tea Party hero Rand Paul does a complete volte-face.

He wants his



As Think Progress reports

In a Wall Street Journal profile this weekend, Paul signaled an about-face on his earmark position, committing to “fight for Kentucky’s share of earmarks and federal pork.” After all, he’s “not that crazy” of a libertarian

Father and son, age 47, have different styles. Asked what he wanted to do in Washington in a Wednesday morning television interview, the senator-elect said that his kids were hoping to meet the Obama girls. He has made other concessions to the mainstream. He now avoids his dad’s talk of shuttering the Federal Reserve and abolishing the income tax. In a bigger shift from his campaign pledge to end earmarks, he tells me that they are a bad “symbol” of easy spending but that he will fight for Kentucky’s share of earmarks and federal pork, as long as it’s doled out transparently at the committee level and not parachuted in in the dead of night. “I will advocate for Kentucky’s interests,” he says.


Oops. Fancy a cup of coffee instead?

Throw the bums out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're giving the teabags too much credit.
They didn't know what they stood for before the election and they are likely to be 100% flexible now that their candidate is in office. It was never about real values, it was about winning. I think many believed that their traditional rethug leadership couldn't do the job so they dumped them. Simple as that.

Also, let's be real: these people are too numb to actually know what Paul is doing with his new power. How would they know? That would require "reading" and "listening."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. If any of their number poke their head up & show a glimmer of sanity
They get targeted by the others and are pecked away into oblivion. That's what Scott Brown is learning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. But that was obvious ftom day one. Wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. To everyone else but them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RonReagan Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-08-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. This changes nothing
They certainly have been had, but they will never realize it. When over 60% of the public doesn't know plain, simple facts like the religion of the president, do you really think any of them will realize the policy flipflop of a Kentucky senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No as they will clearly change the definition of what is pork
in order to fit in with It's OK if a Republican does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Pork rind or pork rand? Didn't take long did it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. So he's a hypocritical butthead
Call me shocked. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC