Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush Limbaugh: 'Pre-Existing Condition Coverage is Not Insurance; It's Welfare'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:16 AM
Original message
Rush Limbaugh: 'Pre-Existing Condition Coverage is Not Insurance; It's Welfare'
Has anyone said today what a piece of sheeyit Rush Limbaugh is?

Yes, he really said that. He really, truly did, and it's a BFD. digby writes:

Although it sounds ridiculous, Rush is in the process of making his followers believe that the pre-existing condition provision in the health care reforms is something bad and shameful. The reason he's doing this, of course, is because this is the most popular piece of the bill and the one on which the rest of it hinges. If they can divide people on that, the repeal of the plan will be much easier.

Absolutely 100% on the money. The rest of the Affordable Care Act, along with any other proposal for reform like single payer or a public option hinges on one single provision: No exclusion for pre-existing conditions. So the Corpulent One knows that the only way to marshall support for complete repeal is to erode support for covering people with pre-existing conditions.

It drives me crazy now just as it did during the whole debate that there wasn't more focus on effective dates. Waiting until January 1, 2014 for the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions was risky and opens a window for a long, sustained attack. Whether they had passed Medicare for All, a robust public option as part of the overall bill, none of that, or all of that, the heart of the debate is over people who have pre-existing conditions, which are defined by insurers and have been broadened more and more over time. This is only one of many salvos which will be thrown over and over and over again.

digby, again:

People thought it was insane for Rush to say that he wanted the president to fail. But he held the line and made the GOP come crawling for even suggesting that he was wrong. And the party just became more and more radical. They don't see health care reform as sacred and they will feel absolutely no remorse about destroying it.

Listen & More:
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/rush-limbaugh-pre-existing-condition-covera
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. No
This is the "you don't insure the burning house theory."

The problem comes up time and time again, and insurers have addressed it. The simplest way, in the context of a private, for -profit system with Government backstops, is to create a reinsurance mechanism allowing insurers to cede premium in exchange for upper end limits on payouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. Since private insurers were exempt from liability for denying care to those ALREADY PAYING
for coverage... there is no need tocreate a "reinsurance mechanism".

Insurers are making profits by denying care to those who paid into the system. They have no argument. None that's valid. At least not until that exemption from liability is removed from law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Considering the fact that Limbaugh would be ineligible for private health insurance
due to his drug abuse, this is pretty damn funny, isn't it?

NOT.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That wouldn't disqualify him but his other health history does
and I'm talking about the MI he had in Hawaii, treated courtesy of Hawaiian SOCIALIST health insurance.

He's just taking his spewing orders from the fascist plutocracy. It's going to get worse and worse until he either explodes from gluttony or struck by well deserved lightning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Yeah, really.
I'm not a big fan of what the DNC calls health insurance reform, but Limbaugh of all people should be cheering it. Rush would not qualify for any private plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wehere is the Karma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. He would know, he was once on welfare himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rush is such a pig


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. PLEASE don't insult pigs
they are so far about that POS. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. lol..yeah...pigs are smart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Hey! That pig didn't do anything to deserve being compared to Rush Limbaugh!
Not nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashleyforachange Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Disgusting...
I am disgusted by Limbaugh. People like him and Beck use the system to its fullest and now they are trying to make it where people who are in the same position as they were once in cannot get assistance in these economic hard times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. After all, where would the next Limbaugh/Beck come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovemydog Donating Member (414 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. what an asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. What if it is?
How is that bad? The government is obliged to provide welfare. The Constitution says so. Welfare is not a dirty word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Unfortunately, welfare is a dirty word to much of the population.
Perhaps even to the majority. Rethugs have often used welfare-terror to win votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. You are right and that's my point.
Just like socialist and liberal. People know for certain that these things are evil but they can't explain why if their lives depend on it. Propaganda has been so pervasive, we often have to use synonyms to discuss them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Insurance companies who drop sick people and refuse to cover everybody
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 02:44 AM by pnwmom
are practicing HIGHWAY ROBBERY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. They are practicing mass murder n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. some of his listeners have been denied health coverage for pre-existing conditions
and some portion of those will realize he does not give a fuck about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. Huckabee spoke against
requiring coverage of pre-exisitng conditions too. He said it was like offering fire insurance after the house burns.
This appears to be something the RW wants eliminated.
What sick people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. i really love when people who claim to be christians who believe in jesus
go around saying this bullshit. from my memory jesus would want us to help the less fortunate and help each other. whatever you do to the least of us you do to me sort of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. That was my first thought when reading this.
How this cruel and heartless person can have even one listener who claims to be Christian is beyond me. It's really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. We don't have the best health care in the World, just the most profitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. ...profitable to the insurance companies.
Given the cost and level of training, I'm not convinced that being a GP is any more profitable than some business manager positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. and the for profit hospital corps. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. Not if the person receiving treatment is paying for it
That's a super crappy straw man, even for Gasbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. If it is "welfare" then how does the pig explain how insurance companies
refuse to pay for treatment even if the person has ALWAYS had insurance?

HINT: If you are self-insured, there is no "portability" of health insurance. If you lose employer-provided insurance and switch to an individual policy, or switch from one company's individual policy to another, you will be denied coverage for a preexisting condition even if you NEVER had a gap in insurance coverage. In fact, most companies will flag a claim for a serious condition to try to "prove" that it is "preexisting,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
25. Except when you have anal cysts. Then it's not welfare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. Thank you for this. I just posted to FB with this rant....

I try really hard not to use profanity at FB due to friends' kids being on there and seeing things, but dayum....Limbaugh and Beck make that so friggin hard.


Yep, he said it. Listen for yourself. "Pre-existing condition coverage is welfare. The idea of requiring pre-existing condition coverage is to drive insurance companies out of business." Have you people SEEN the profits insurance companies have made...obscene CEO bonuses?! If this is the preferred form of "entert...ainment," God help us. He is an asshat, but a rich asshat laughing all the way to the bank on the backs of his listeners, many of whom no doubt have pre-existing conditions, perhaps no coverage at all, receiving unemployment benefits, Medicare, Social Security benefits; you know, all that "evil" socialism stuff that would never have been in existence if Republicans had their way over the decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. .....that from the 300 pound chronic anal cyst......
who cares what that bag-o-pus says anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
28. kinda like DRUG ADDICTION, eh?
perhaps his own insurors should drop him..

of course he's wealthy enough to self cover anyway, so it;s no biggie to him,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. holy shit. when I think he can't stoop any lower...
and,yes I am one of those pre-existing condition folks. I don't dare look for another job.
Rush will circle in the depths of Hell,I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
31. Here's an interesting exercise . . .
Is there any way of finding his remarks on Bob "BobDoleSays" Dole's 1994 GOP "alternative" to the plan advanced by the Clinton Admin? Betcha ol' Phlush Phlegmball just LOVED it back then!

Now that it's been triangulated into "Obamacare," it's filthy welfare, creeping socialism and the heartbreak of psoriasis all rolled into one.

Hypocrisy, thy name is Phlush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
33. Well, it is, in a sense:
it's coverage that the "free market" wants to deny, that government forces it to accept.

Good. A laissez-faire health care policy would be a total disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
34. maybe he should chat it up a little regarding his ass cyst..
that is a pre-existing condition for his mental state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
35. If that's the case, why shouldn't Medicare refuse to cover pre-existing conditions?
Of course, I'm being majorly :sarcasm:

It really pisses me off that I can't buy into Medicare.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
38. I am guessing that Limbaugh's preexisting condition of douchebaggery doesn't keep him from getting
health insurance. Someone should point that out to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. Just amazing the amount of damage we've allowed that one piece of Satan's shit to do!
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 06:10 PM by FiveGoodMen
How many millions of lives have been ruined or lost because of this fucker's propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. What about corporate welfare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
41. The Right Wing has been absolutely brilliant and quite successful employing the Southern Strategy...
Because the Republicans have employed the Southern Strategy which has seen its success by characterizing every policy position that Democrats espouse into "welfare policies." They have racialized non-racial public policies, such as unemployment insurance and health care reform, for instance. We've seen it in Kentucky and West Virginia during the Democratic primaries where white people openly admitted that they wouldn't vote for Obama because he's black and because somehow his policies would "reward people who don't deserve it," translation: black and brown people.

The Southern Strategy has worked now for nearly 40 years. I thought Webb would be smart enough to see what's going on.

The reason why there's "Reagan Democrats" is precisely because Reagan played the race card so effectively that white Democrats--particularly white male Democrats--began to vote against their own best interest because they were frightened and/or hated black people who are "shiftless and lazy" and just want a handout.

Watch Rachel Maddow. She has done such a brilliant job rehashing the history of Republicans playing the race card and employing the Southern Strategy. The Republicans want the final vestiges of the Southern Democrats or "Dixiecrats." If the Republicans can grab any remaining Southern Democrats by appealing to their racism and fear, they would have succeeded.

That's what this is about. Limpballs is a racist. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC