Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Private Security Companies Sign Code of Conduct

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:44 AM
Original message
Private Security Companies Sign Code of Conduct
Private Security Companies Sign Code of Conduct
Published November 09, 2010 | Associated Press

GENEVA -- Major private security companies signed a code of conduct Tuesday, pledging to respect human rights and the rule of law in conflict zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan, where some have been accused of abuses against the local population and reckless behavior.

The voluntary code developed by industry and government representatives was signed by 58 companies including Britain's G4S and U.S.-based DynCorp International and Xe Services -- formerly known as Blackwater Worldwide.

~snip~

Private security companies contracted by governments and non-governmental organizations have seen a boom in business over the past decades, particularly due to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, where they have been hired to guard individuals, installations and convoys.

~snip~

"There's a lot of money in this industry and this code is going to be vital to it," Clapham said.

His words were echoed by Nick Buckles, the head of G4S, which is the world's biggest private security company with has an annual revenue last year of $11 billion and 600,000 staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure it's a wonderfully crafted document
but seems redundant.

There are already plenty of laws on the books, which suggest that torture and murder should be avoided whenever practicable. The laws seem to have little effect on the private security forces, so I wonder about the effect of a signature on a voluntary code.

It's good theater. They must be learning from BP's improved PR campaigns.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC