Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teabagger "Patriot"'s lie in local paper debunked. Claimed 3/4 of Founding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:06 PM
Original message
Teabagger "Patriot"'s lie in local paper debunked. Claimed 3/4 of Founding
Fathers were pastors. The teabagger who was interviewed by the paper recently is the leader of the local morons calling themselves "Patriots". The author of this LTTE is a highly respected leader of the community and former state legislator.

Letter to the Editor

Published: Tuesday, November 9, 2010
“I mean, the original Founding Fathers — three-fourths of them were pastors.”

Really? That assertion in Tea Party "Patriot" Tom Smith’s Gazette interview (Nov. 1) surprised me. It would also have surprised the Founding Fathers.

However you define the Founders, almost none of them were pastors. Of the 55 framers of the Constitution (74 were named by the states, but only 55 came to the convention), none were ministers. Of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, only one, John Witherspoon, was a minister. Of 20 other prominent Americans often classed as Founding Fathers, none was a minister.

His false statement is used to support his questionable claim that “the Constitution was designed by God, or close to it.” Actually, the Constitution, and the Declaration, were designed by lawyers. More than 30 lawyers served in the constitutional convention. The Declaration of Independence was written by a committee of five: Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Robert Livingston and Roger Sherman. Franklin was the only non-lawyer; Jefferson is credited with being the principal author; 24 of the signers were lawyers. Twelve of the other 20 Founding Fathers were lawyers.

Somehow, the truthful statement that half of the Founding Fathers were lawyers just doesn’t imply the same divine inspiration, does it?

The Framers themselves left God out of the Constitution entirely, recognizing religion only in the First Amendment, which protects religious and other liberties. They were not working to create a moral document, but a legal one: a Constitution that would create a stronger central government.

Smith and his group seem to want to use the Constitution selectively as a support for their personal beliefs, a function it was not designed or intended for.

Jefferson himself believed of the Constitution “Time and changes … may require corresponding modifications” and laughed at those “who look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence.”

If, as Smith says, the Patriots seek to educate the public, they should begin by educating themselves. Making obviously false public statements is not a good way for them to gain credibility."

(signed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is a great letter. Facts, ands stuff.
Teabaggers juat make crap up, and hope no one calls them on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It's an empiracally proved fact that 63.5% ....
... of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kookaburra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. What I don't get is why this clown's lies weren't
debunked by the so-called journalist who interviewed him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. The guy that interviewed him for the small town paper is very stupid. I know him
personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Teabagger revisionism
if they don't like the facts, they'll just re-write them. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. According to one credible historian, none of the first 10 presidents were Christian although Jackson
became a Christian after he left office.

Note there is a major distinction between belief in a supernatural deity or nature's god and those who profess belief in a God and the attendant Trinity etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. And three weeks from now, someone will say it again
And three weeks after that, again. The process will be repeated until the lie has ingrained itself into the political consciousness, and will soon no longer even be discussed. A new fact will have been born.

The madness, as usual, has a method, and that's to create some kind of equivalency between the Constitution and the Bible, and argue for a literal or "fundamentalist" reading of each. One of the major problems, of course, will be that the folks giving us the "literal" interpretation of the Constitution will be no more knowledgeable about English than they are about ancient Hebrew, Greek or Aramaic. So instead of a "literal" reading, we'll get their highly selective, cherry-picked version of what it all means, which will be presented as Original Truth.

The lie won't die on its own. It has to be met every time, shown to be in error every time, and patiently exposed as snake oil. Every time. If we let it go by even once, the lie gathers strength. And there's no guarantee that for every time the lie is told, a follow up rebuttal will be published. It was published this time, saints be praised, but will someone take the time and trouble to do a full rebuttal every time the lie (or a portion of the lie) is told? And if they do, will the paper run it again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Sad and excellent point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. Excellent points.
Yeah, we keep hearing this garbage from the right wing religious extremists. If we listen to them, that is. They have thoroughly convinced their gullible followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. ReTHUGS and Teapublicans
just make up shit as they go along. They don't give a flying fuck - they just repeat it until those who refuse to read spread ignorance. If you don't believe me, ask Bill Clinton or Barack Obama. The amount of shit made up about them should blow most minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. A great letter...knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Witherspoon was the only pastor to sign the D of I and he was a champion
of free thought which he used to build Princeton into a great college when he served as President.


Only Adams was a conventional Christian. All the rest were radical deists, including Washington, Jefferson, Franklin.


I believe Madison discovered conservative Christianity long after the revolution at the same time he discovered how important the rich were to stabilize a society and counter the reforms that the other fathers risked their lives for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Isn't that Reese Witherspoon's great great great great grand-father?
I know she's related to someone historic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fifthoffive Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Adams
Although raised a Congregationalist, Adams became a Unitarian as an adult and rejected the Christian belief in the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus. Unitarians are not generally considered Christians, and were not considered Christians in Adams's day. He was not, as reported in some places, an atheist. Neither did he believe in a god who was interested in or interfered in human lives. His beliefs were strongly influenced by the Deists at Harvard when he attended college.

He could, based on his reported beliefs, be called a Deist, though I doubt he called himself that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. The word that comes to mind is: SMACKDOWN!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. When Laz and I went to Mt. Vernon a couple weeks ago, we did the house tour -
In "Washington's Bedroom", there was a bible on what was identified as Martha's chair. A father with a "Thomas Paine University Alumni" tee-shirt on was going on and on about "was that the Bible George Washington read every night?"...the answer - we don't know about George, but this belonged to Martha.
It was well know and written about by contemporaries that even though George attended church with Martha, he rarely did so whenever he was not with her, and never hung around for Communion.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. There's also the No Religious Test Clause in Article VI
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Seems odd that God would put that in... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Where Pastors or owned Pastures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Seems to me
Edited on Tue Nov-09-10 07:38 PM by AsahinaKimi
Only an idiot would make up a story about the founding fathers being pastors.. oh, wait!...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. great letter...thanks for educating your neighbors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. From Indiana gazette
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. IT WOULD BE helpful to have a link to the original claim
but I can't seem to find one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Here's the clown in his own words:
He says he is a Democrat. :rofl:

"...Question: With the principles you talk about — support of the Constitution, against abortion — is it fair to assume your members are Republicans or a little farther to the right of Republicans?

Answer: Chauncey, I’m a Democrat. I became a Democrat when I was 18 years old. John F. Kennedy had not been assassinated too long before that. And today, in my humble belief, John Kennedy would be right of most Republicans.

On a personal note, I am a Democratic committeeman. I ran this year. That’s another thing our group did, we had 20-some people run and get on these local committees to get our voice in there.

But boy, oh boy, that first meeting I went to, the Armstrong County Democrats, was enlightening. I was up front. I have a lot of faults, but dishonesty is not one of them. And I informed them of who I was, I told them that I was a conservative Democrat — I am right of Reagan. And I’m here to find out what happened to my party.

And there was some good conversation there.

But in our group, I can never remember of anyone asking anyone, “What party are you affiliated with?” It’s just a question that’s never asked.

They’re all coming there for the same reason, for love of this country, and our belief that the Constitution was absolutely designed by God or close to it. I mean, the original Founding Fathers — three fourths of them were pastors."

The rest: http://www.indianagazette.com/articles/2010/11/01/news/doc4ccee9958e5b6569561555.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. He's a Democrat? E-gads!
and he needs to find out what happened to his party? JFK would be a Republican today? Reagan would be left of him?
:crazy:
Not only does he not know history, he doesn't know much of anything!

And, a bunch of them got elected? YIKES!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. Back in the 18th century, "seminary" meant college, not "religious learning" as the Teabaggers think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Also, the literalist fundamentalist strain of Christianity is a very recent invention
It didn't really take root in the United States until the 1920s, though there are antecedents in the decades before that. What passes for literal biblical interpretation nowadays, and presents itself as The Truth, would have been dismissed out of hand by 18th century disciples of the Enlightenment as so much ignorant blather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's interesting. I had heard Patrick Henry "give me liberty or death" was a pastor.
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 04:00 PM by mistertrickster
Turns out, he was NOT.

On edit--he was a not so successful business man, later politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC