Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin pretends to know something about economics and the Fed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:47 AM
Original message
Sarah Palin pretends to know something about economics and the Fed.

Palin Responds to Real Time Economics and We Respond

Palin: So, imagine my dismay when I read an article by Sudeep Reddy in today’s Wall Street Journal criticizing the fact that I mentioned inflation in my comments about QE2 in a speech this morning before a trade-association. Here’s what I said: “everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries knows that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so. Pump priming would push them even higher.”

Mr. Reddy takes aim at this. He writes: “Grocery prices haven’t risen all that significantly, in fact.”

...

Now I realize I’m just a former governor and current housewife from Alaska, but even humble folks like me can read the newspaper. I’m surprised a prestigious reporter for the Wall Street Journal doesn’t.

...

WSJ: The Nov. 4 Wall Street Journal article noted, in its first sentence, “the tamest year of food pricing in nearly two decades.” It does indeed report that supermarkets and restaurants are facing cost pressures that could push their retail prices higher — but it hasn’t happened yet on a large scale.


If anyone had any doubts that the half-term Governor of Alaska is preparing for a Presidential bid I think this should put them to rest. Does anyone really think she understands the things she is talking about? This seems to be part of a recent PR effort by the right. For example see this recent Media Matters piece: Glenn Beck might not know what the word "deflation" means. The PR push consists of classic GOP techniques and themes.

1) Anti-Intellectualism
Those point headed types are just so dumb, with all their facts and knowledge and stuff. Us humble average folks can easily see they are wrong.
The issue at hand is the Fed's QE2 program that they are undertaking to battle disinflation and deflation. One can argue about whether it will work or not , but the reality of disinflation (the inflation rate getting smaller and smaller heading toward deflation) is a factual question.

2) Muddy the facts
That we are experiencing disinflation is undeniably true. Inflation rates are at or near historical lows both in measures of core inflation and for food specifically (as the WSJ article points out). While it is true that food prices are increasing more than others this has always been true and has nothing to do with the overall trend of disinflation. Whether core inflation is high or low food inflation will be slightly higher.

3) Faux and/or misguided populism
So, the take away is supposed to be that those pointy headed types just don't get ordinary people's concerns and are pursuing policies that hurt the average Joe. But, as we've seen, what they are pointing to has nothing to do with any particular Fed policy. This is misguided because, should we choose to ignore disinflation and deflation, the economy will shrink. This means that many of these average Joes will not have money or a job to buy the oh so low priced food.

4) Waving the bloody shirt of stagflation
That was a phrase Paul Krugman used recently to describe how the right uses the stagflation of the 1970's to argue against any and all policies enacted under liberals. Certain liberal policies led in the past to a stagnant economy with rising inflation. And, as we all know, something that was true once under one set of circumstances is always true in all circumstances :sarcasm:. I see this both as a defensive and offensive measure. On the offense it resonates with a 30 year old attack on any and all liberal policies... "INFLATION! BOO! AHHHHHH!" And also it is a defense of those past attacks since the data right now isn't cooperating. "Well, see, our claims of liberal inflation really are true. It is just that those pointy heads haven't bothered to look at food prices."

5) Party of No!
The final theme is the most common one. "We oppose anything and everything that happens under Obama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's from all that book-learnin and deep thinkin' she does on her back porch
while House Mom Todd builds fences to keep the prying eyes of reporters at bay. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. I learn!
K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. "imagine my dismay" "prestigious"?
No way Sarah wrote that.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Stop Tearing Down Poor Sarah Failin
We want her to run in 2012, and we want her to win the nomination!!! Don't tell the righties that she's an idiot with no possibility of winning until it's too late!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. palin has no right to call herself a former governor
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 10:58 AM by Angry Dragon
She was elected to a job that she desired.
She found that she could not handle that job anymore.
She quit near the midterm of that job.
A person has no right to claim a title to something they quit halfway through.
She had a contract that she broke, nothing more than a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. she throws in a few remarks that are currently in the news to make
herself seem informed...in a debate she would be like the notawitch woman...what she wants on her resume is presidential candidate...like Buchanan.....empty suits...both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But, at least she has finally answered the question about what she reads!
The Wall Street Journal apparently. Yeaaaahhh riiiight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. inflation hurts the rich more. that's why it's been made into a boogyman.
higher interest rates help SAVERS. higher taxes make companies INVEST instead of profiteering ONLY.
fucking greenspan killed natural interest rate economy fixing. georgee's low interst rates during his term DID NOT CREATE A GREAT ECONOMY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. She could stand in front of a microphone and cluck like chicken -and the Teabaggers would think it
sounds absolutely brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. One has to wonder if, god forbid, she won, would she quit half-way through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Let's hope we don't find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC