Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Falin Palin lies again... imagine that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Soral Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:24 PM
Original message
Falin Palin lies again... imagine that
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 04:24 PM by Soral
FIRST HER LIE.........

Sarah Palin is baking up some controversy over proposed school nutrition guidelines in Pennsylvania. At a fundraising event at a Buck’s County school today, the former Alaska governor intends to serve students cookies to make a point about “laissez-faire” government.

Pennsylvania’s proposed school nutrition guidelines would limit the number of sweets in classroom parties and encourage parents to serve more healthy snacks. The proposal, which will be voted on this spring, would also slash the number of birthday and holiday parties allowed in classrooms.

Yesterday Palin tweeted that, in addition to her fundraising power, she “may bring cookies” to the Plumstead Christian School to protest the guidelines.

“Hmm...may bring cookies to my PA school speech tmrw to make a pt ‘PA mulls ban on cake/cookies/candy@ school parties,’” Palin posted, linking to an article from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review about the guidelines.

Today Palin took it further saying Pennsylvania was a “nanny state run amok.”

“2 PA school speech; I'll intro kids 2 beauty of laissez-faire via serving them cookies amidst school cookie ban debate;Nanny state run amok!” the 2008 vice presidential candidate posted on Twitter.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/11/sarah-palin-tackles-school-nutrition-debate-with-cookies.html

AND NOW THE TRUTH.....

Despite Sarah Palin's recent remarks that Pennsylvania is considering a "ban" on sweets at school parties, state education officials say they have no interest in laying down the law on cookies and cupcakes.

The State Board of Education has been weighing new school nutrition guidelines for nearly six months that encourage healthier choices, but they wouldn't create any no-cookie mandates.

"This proposed regulation does not impose requirements or sanctions about classroom parties," said State Department of Education spokesman Steve Weitzman. "We are not counting cookies or limiting parties."

http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/mc-sarah-palin-cookies-20101110,0,4342734.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dyler Turden Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have to ask.
What educator in his or her right mind would want Palin addressing young minds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soral Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. probably someone who supports NCLB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Plumstead Christian School. I think the name says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyler Turden Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That explains a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope parents get the chance to opt out of this little gathering...
I wouldn't want any child of mine to be forced to listen to her word salad. And I wouldn't want them seeing an adult use cheat notes from her hand either. I don't think I'd want them to be exposed to a wolf murderer and a pathological liar either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is Palin going to indoctrinate our children??
The wackos have a fit when Obama speaks to children, but Palin is allowed.



:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CurtEastPoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I heard she was going to start PlumStupid Christian school. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. To be fair, the Tribune-Review did publish that and AP picked up on the story.
Our paper, the Patriot-News in Harrisburg, also printed the AP story but in TODAY'S edition, they have a front-page retraction explaining the mistake and chastising themselves for not verifying the information before printing it. Palin, of course, took it beyond what was printed and injected fear about the "sugar police" into the discussion but so did FOX Noise so that's no shock. I'm sure they are all aware by now that the story was bogus, but they'll probably continue spreading the myth because it fits their political bias. So, how's that $200M/day trip Obama's taking going?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Palin's Tea Party theme: If it isn't true, pretend it isn't and keep on complaining
The party of No is turning into the party of "WAAAAAAA!!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC