|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:04 AM Original message |
Rescinding the Bush Tax Cuts on the Top 2% Would Pay Off the Entire Social Security Trust Fund. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabatha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is NOT PayGo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 02:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. huffingtonpost just listed that Obama isn't going to do away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Recommended and Kicked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. agreed. the bush tax cuts, most of which went to the top 2%, are the main cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. This should truly be the citizens line in the sand. We should target ANY AND EVERY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yet taxes on the top 2% doesn't begin to get us out of our budget deficit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. it pays off social security. which does indeed more than "begin" to reduce the deficit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ernesto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
6. works for me.... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
8. But that would punish rich people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 02:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. even though they'd still get to be rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-11-10 02:57 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Add in that we're talking an extra 4 grand per 100k after 250k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC