Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans are conflicted over earmark ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 01:17 PM
Original message
Republicans are conflicted over earmark ban
Tea party Republicans railed against earmarks this campaign season, and now that many tea partiers are headed to the Senate, longtime members of Congress are pushing for their first real shot at banning these member-directed spending provisions once and for all.

So why isn't everyone on board?

The Senate GOP leader, Kentucky's Mitch McConnell, is a conservative and longtime member of the Senate Appropriations Committee who has supported past bans on earmarks. But even he argues that earmarks--individual items that lawmakers personally insert into spending bills--serve a vital purpose for senators looking to bring home federal money to their constituents.

"The earmark issue is about discretion--about an argument between the executive branch and the legislative branch over how funds should be spent," McConnell said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." "There are many members of my conference who have said, 'I don't want the president to make all the decisions about how the funds are spent that might be allocated in my state.'"

McConnell reiterated much the same point on an appearance the same day on CBS's "Face the Nation"--and added that, contrary to claims from fellow conservatives, he doesn't believe an earmark ban will actually save any money.

More:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101109/pl_yblog_upshot/republicans-conflicted-over-earmark-ban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you don't need the government why are
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 01:20 PM by county worker
"senators looking to bring home federal money to their constituents"?

It is a way to get votes by saying something to the stupid teabaggers that in reality will never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Restoopicans are conflicted about a lot of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. When have they ever been conflicted about saying one thing and doing another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. They left it out of the Pledge
I think it will be up to Dems to bring it up and, hopefully, get video of Republicans fighting to keep it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. The GOP hypocrites are conflicted by the term 'earmark', because they turned into a dirty word,
Edited on Thu Nov-11-10 02:05 PM by Swamp Rat
yet they want to employ it for themselves now.

Oh well, since their based has an average IQ of 90 and a 20 second attention span they'll figure something out.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC