Why don't they fight back??

[DainBramaged]

"Why don't they fight back?"

That's the question I've been hearing from the Democratic Party's stunned and dispirited base. For the past month, I've been on a book tour that has taken me to Asheville, N.C., Terre Haute, Ind., Austin and elsewhere. Everywhere I go, supporters of President Obama and his agenda ask me why so many Democrats in Washington don't stand up for what they say they believe.

I confess that I don't have a good answer. What I can say with confidence, however, is that the White House and Democrats in Congress ignore these grumblings at their peril. Call it polarization, call it conviction, call it whatever you like: These are not wishy-washy times. If you don't stand for something, you get run over.

We saw this principle in action last week. Anomie among the Democratic base was not the main reason the party suffered what Obama called a "shellacking" in the midterms, but clearly it was a factor. Elements of the party's traditional coalition - minorities, women, young people - voted in much smaller numbers than they did in 2008. The "enthusiasm gap" turned out to be real, and it had real consequences.

I've been hearing frustration at the willingness of Democrats to accommodate a Republican Party that refuses to give an inch. To progressives who may not understand the subtleties of inside-the-Beltway thinking, this looks like surrender.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/11/AR2010111106085.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

[leeroysphitz]

1. It isn't surrender. It's complicity. n/t

[spanone]

2. one wonders

[OregonBlue]

3. The MSM is making hyping this fight. I'm not sure that they are not going to fight back. You can't

trust the "news". They are in it for the headlines and the money. And yes, I include MSNBC.

[steve2470]

4. k & r and love your cat photo ! nt