Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need help from DU History buffs:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:32 PM
Original message
Need help from DU History buffs:
I've got a teabagger on Faebook that's claiming that Mahatma Gandhi was a pedophile. Something about having sex with a bunch of twelve year olds. My bullshit detector is seriously redlining here, anybody got any good sources showing he's wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's trash
...and the person making the claim has the burden of proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Make him prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. His marriage was arranged when they were both thirteen or fourteen, I believe
That probably got spun into "the adult Gandhi was clearly a child molestor" through the usual leaps of logic.

Of course, the burden of proof is on the teabagger to support his argument. I'm sure if you press him he'll come up with some wonderfully "credible" sources, of course. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. This is a pretty good article about Ghandi and sex... no child molesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is actually some evidence for it in the western sense
because after his vow of celibacy, he slept with anyone who was willing, but sleeping is all they ever did. Some of the willing were family members. It was his way of testing his resolve. He passed the tests.

It's the tropics, so sleeping is done nude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. here:
"Mohandas Gandhi's sleeping arrangements attracted public attention during the winter of 1946-47, when he was trying to quell violence between Muslims and Hindus in the Noakhali district in what is now Bangladesh. It came out that Gandhi was bunking nightly with his 19-year-old grandniece, Manu. In part this was an effort to stay warm in the winter chill, but Gandhi soon acknowledged there was more to it: he was testing his vow of brahmacharya, or total chastity in thought and deed. If he could spend the night in a woman's embrace without feeling sexual stirrings, it would demonstrate that he had conquered his carnal impulses and become "God's eunuch." It turned out that Manu was not his first brahmacharya lab partner--he'd also recently gotten naked (partly, at least) with another young woman in his extended family, starting when she was 18.

Unschooled as you are in the mysteries of the East, David, you scoff--and to be frank, there were quite a few raised eyebrows in India. One of the most vocal critics was Nirmal Kumar Bose, a university lecturer who served as Gandhi's interpreter in Noakhali. While conceding that no hanky-panky had taken place (Gandhi and his entourage typically all slept in the same room) . . . Gandhi believed that sex for pleasure was sinful (for that matter, he felt eating chocolate was sinful), that sexual attraction between men and women was unnatural, and that husband and wife should live together as brother and sister, having sex only for purposes of procreation. . . .

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2521/did-mahatma-gandhi-sleep-with-virgins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. 19 and 18. Ok, so the charge was pedophilia.
So this does not address that charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. did you not read it?
He didn't HAVE SEX WITH HARDLY ANYONE! And the ones he "slept with" - and that was only sleeping - were overage anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Did you not read my reply?
The charge was pedophilia and the data provided is for two women who a) he probably did not have sex with, and b) were not children.

I have no idea what you and I are arguing about, but I'm pretty sure you are dead wrong :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. In 18th/19th century America unmarried people slept together...
with a bundling board between them,or being wrapped in blankets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundling_(tradition)

(interesting I have to check out that court case its from my county)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's getting his right wing smears mixed up, that claim is
usually reserved for Mohammad. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Could it be that the poor soud has confused Mahatma with Mohammed
the prophet of Islam. Mohammed had what some might
call a child bride and the Fundies make this same
accusation against him. Remind them that even in
this "Christian" country men married some very very
young girls in earlier times. Different times had
different social rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't give you the source but i read that he sometimes or once slept with young girls in his bed
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 01:44 PM by kenny blankenship
without having sex with them to, I guess, improve his chastity through what you might call stress testing.

You don't have to search far on the internetz to find out something about this:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2521/did-mahatma-gandhi-sleep-with-virgins

If you're interested you can take it from there. I don't care about this, so I'm not researching it further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pamelita Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Intersting
Still no source though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Any standard bio
but you should know that facts are liberal in tone...

We are at the point where we live in two realities... so it don't matter what source you show him... it really does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. He slept naked with young girls but claims he never had sex with them.
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 01:54 PM by Lasher
The story is laid out here at Wikipedia. It's creepy but there is no evidence to counter his claim that he never had sex with any of them. Even at that, did that make him a pedofile? I don't know but I wouldn't have left my daughter alone with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. there were usally lots of peoplel al l sleeping in the same room
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Please consider reading the Wiki section I linked.
It's wrong to characterize this as just crowded bedrooms or to suppose it happened in an environment where sex could not have occurred because others would have witnessed it. He slept naked alongside young girls, in the same bed, to test his willpower to resist copulating with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Your wiki page doesn't help you much.
The closest we get to an actual act of pedophilia is 'sleeping with the 16 year old wife' of an associate. Unfortunately for your prejudices, this cannot be pedophilia if the woman in question was of legal age, even if there was actual sex involved. The other documented instances involve 18 and 19 year old women, which even by our current standards is not pedophilia. In all the documentation cited so far, everyone involved insisted that in fact there was no sex. So we are left with 'nude sleeping'. There is no crime there. You might not know if sleeping in the nude is 'pedofilia', but I do. It is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Perhaps objectivity is being compromised here less by my prejudices than by yours.
I didn't pass judgment on him as a pedofile. I said I didn't know. Learn to read.

Being a wife, perhaps by arranged marriage as was the custom in that region, does not make Abba's age not sixteen at the time. Abha Gandhi died in 1995 at the age of 68, which means this incident occurred around 1943. And so a 73 year old Mohandas Gandhi slept in the same bed with the 16 year old wife of his grandnephew while they both were naked, to see if he would get a woody.

And yet you try to characterize this as simply sleeping in the nude. It was not. I said it's creepy. It is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. That happened in 1643 on the Starship Enterprise while it was in orbit of Alderon - enter Death Star
Fortunately, the Enterprise was able to escape the explosion shortly before Buzz Lightyear arrived and totally fucked everything up because he had a Woody.

Tell that fucking teabagger to get the FACTS straight!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. First his name was Mohandas not Mahatma
I'm always amazed that people who claim to be his followers never bother to even read his autobiography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. When he was older he used to share a bedroom with girls. He never touched them but it was creepy
enough reading about that in a ghandi biography I read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. Look Up Bar And Bat Mitzfah...
According to Jewish law, when Jewish children reach 13 years old for boys and 12 years old for girls they become responsible for their actions, and "become a Bar or Bat Mitzvah" (English: Daughter (Bat) or Son (Bar) of the commandments). In many Conservative and Reform synagogues, girls celebrate becoming a Bat Mitzvah at age 12<1>, along with boys at 13. This also coincides with physical puberty.<2> Prior to this, the child's parents hold the responsibility for the child's adherence to Jewish law and tradition. After this age, children bear their own responsibility for Jewish ritual law, tradition, and ethics and are privileged to participate in all areas of Jewish community life.<3> Sometimes the ceremony itself is erroneously referred to as a Bar or Bat Mitzvah.


Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_and_Bat_Mitzvah

All I mean by this, is that for most of human history, the age of consent was more closely related to the age of puberty, and NOT just in Jewish tradition.

There were no public schools, most were not going to go to college, back then you became an adult as soon as you reached puberty. And yes you could have sex, but you also had to work your as off every day because you were now considered an adult and had to work the farm.

Now a days... we have the problem of backing the age of consent away form puberty because we want our young people to have a chance at learning and succeeding before being encumbered by the responsibilities of parenthood.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC