Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(The US Air Force's) War-Toy Wishes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 08:00 AM
Original message
(The US Air Force's) War-Toy Wishes


The weirdest, coolest hardware in the American arsenal



As Lockheed Martin’s Marietta, Ga., plant prepares to begin building the 187th—and last—F-22 super-fighter, the military is already dreaming of its successor. In a query to the aerospace industry earlier this month, the Air Force laid out its wish list, and it wants everything: a plane that can win dogfights, demolish air-defense missile networks, support ground troops, and run surveillance missions; a partial prototype would be ready by 2020, with entry into service by 2030.

This may be wishful thinking, given the saga of the current wondercraft, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. With a development and production price tag of more than $380 billion, the F-35 is the costliest acquisition program in Pentagon history. Different versions are being developed for the Air Force, Navy, and Marines. But the plane is bedeviled by technical problems, ever-rising costs, and slipping schedules, with the Marines’ incarnation presenting the toughest challenges. Last week the co-chairmen of President Obama’s deficit-reduction commission proposed gutting the program. On Nov. 22, a Pentagon review board is scheduled to take a hard look at it.

Speculation inside the services is that Defense Secretary Robert Gates may agree with the co-chairs. Gates wants, he has said, “greater quantities of systems that represent the 75 percent solution, instead of smaller quantities of 99 percent-exquisite systems.” A congressional air-power expert, who couldn’t be named because of Hill rules, says, “Over the past couple of weeks, the Air Force has begun to look seriously at the latest F-16s,” cheaper stopgaps if Gates slashes the F-35 buy. A senior Pentagon official, who declined to be identified talking about defense spending priorities, cautioned against expecting cuts: “Is the (Marine) version under some pressure in tight budget times? Yes. Does (it) have to be seriously reviewed? Yes. But there is no suggestion of backing away from the F-35.” Asked about the Nov. 22 meeting, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell says, “I’m not in a position to help because all this stuff is under review.” (The Marines didn’t respond to a request for comment. The Air Force referred questions to the Pentagon.)

Even if the F-35 survives, the Air Force’s dreams of a next-generation super-fighter are likely to remain just that. Priorities for future budgets are a new family of bombers and a new tanker fleet. And when next-generation super-fighters do arrive, odds are they won’t resemble either the F-22 or the F-35. They’ll probably be drones—“large numbers of increasingly capable UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles)…(with) the ability to disrupt and overwhelm,” as Gates told an Air Force gathering last year.



unhappycamper comment: After we build that last $355,000,000 F-22, we can start building $243,000,000 F-35s. Oh goody. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice. So is healthcare. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. And maybe then we can finally defeat the Soviets, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC