Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Virginia Thomas stepping down as head of Liberty Central

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:43 PM
Original message
Virginia Thomas stepping down as head of Liberty Central
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/15/AR2010111502982.html?hpid=artslot

Virginia Thomas, political activist and wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has decided to relinquish control of Liberty Central, the conservative group she founded less than a year ago, so that the organization can escape the "distractions" of her media celebrity, a spokeswoman said.

The spokeswoman, Caitlin Carroll of CRC Public Relations in Alexandria, said Monday morning that an announcement was scheduled for later in the day or Tuesday morning detailing the merger of Liberty Central with another organization and Thomas's decision to step down as chief executive.

"She'll take a back seat so that Liberty Central can continue with its mission without any of the distractions," Carroll said. "After discussing it with the board, Mrs. Thomas determined that it was best for the organization."

Carroll declined to elaborate, but a source not authorized to speak publicly about the details said Liberty Central would be merging with the Patrick Henry Center, a Manassas-based conservative organization founded by Gary Aldrich, the former FBI agent who wrote a tell-all book about life inside the Clinton White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great, more time for Saturday morning drunk-dialing.
They got it backwards, it's her dumbass husband who should be stepping down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. did Scalia put a horse's head in her bed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Shhh. That might excite Clarence.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. "the "distractions" of her media celebrity"
Oh my this woman is barking mad. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do the words 'puppet master' come to mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. too little, too late
Thomas needs investigating to see where his wife's conflict of interests affected his decision-making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. For "now"
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 01:58 PM by SoCalDem
Her "work" is done for at least a couple of years.

Watch for her to "consult" quietly as '12 ramps up.. The teabag people have NOT finished their agenda..not by a longshot..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why is she stepping down? I thought there was no impropriety
Well, one thing's for certain: There will be no investigation into this, so we'll never know if there was any outside or undue influence on Justice Thomas concerning his joining in the Citizens United decision. After all, we wouldn't want to politicize a political decision by the nonpartisan Supreme Court that just happened to put a lot more money into the pocket of the wife of one of the justices, would we? That would just be awful! Stove-piping and demagoguery of the worst sort.

Naturally, if there ever comes a time when the shoe could possibly be construed as being on the other foot, and a bare majority of the Supreme Court rules against the monied class, you can bet there will be investigations up the wazoo to ferret out any bias, real or imagined, that might have infected someone on the majority of the panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You got that right, every word of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC