Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pensacola: BP targets submerged oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:52 PM
Original message
Pensacola: BP targets submerged oil
BP cleanup contractors said they will be stepping up efforts in coming weeks to collect tons of buried oil and tar beneath the surface of beaches and waterways in Escambia County.

During a boat tour of Pensacola Bay and Perdido Key on Sunday, Joe Waller, BP’s Pensacola division supervisor for oil spill cleanup, said cleanup contractors are facing new challenges while determining how best to collect deposits of oil and tar that were found submerged at Pensacola Pass near Fort McRee last month.

<snip>

Joseph Pursley, BP’s Florida branch environmental coordinator, said the submerged oil was deposited during the oil spill by strong currents coming through Pensacola Pass from the Gulf. “As the oil came in, it got pounded into the beach, laid down, and then slid back to where it is now,” Pursley said.

<snip>

To minimize environmental damage, the current plan is for commercial divers to collect the oil by hand using special mesh bags that allow water to drain but contain most of the oil and tar.

MORE

http://oilspillaction.com/oil-spill-bp-targets-submerged-oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course they have been denying this stuff exists for months
prohibiting clean-up workers from digging deeper than 6 inches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. what stuff?
:shrug:





:cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee......... that should only take 30 years
and I wonder how many divers will sign up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. but...but...I thought that all the "experts" said there was no submerged oil???!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 17,000 pounds in Pensacola area multiplied how many times?
Makes one wonder if all the spilled oil is simply moving with the tides just below the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Two things for sure: We were lied to...and all the people who live along the coast are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. kicking because it's important
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 07:26 PM by Generic Other
and some unemployed divers might need work.

Scientists Continue to Pander to BP; One “Researcher” Claims Manhattan-Size Oil Plume Simply Disappeared

The debate over toxic dispersant use in the Gulf will continue for years, and one of the “pro use” arguments is that it was the lesser of two evils. Harlan Kirgan from the the Mississippi Press has a story on part of that argument, with one “researcher” saying one of the enormous oil plumes in the Gulf has most likely disappeared.

“This was a gigantic plume,” Terry Hazen, a professor at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, told the Press. “You couldn’t see it or smell it, but it was the size of Manhattan.”

Remember, this is the type of plume that NOAA and other official sources initially said didn’t exist…until they had to change their tune in the face of overwhelming evidence.

<snip>

Look, it’s important to be aware that there will be a lot of these casual rosy predictions coming down the pike, and for the most part, they’re relatively harmless and easily dismissed on a case-by-case basis. But cumulatively, this kind of nonsense can become more of an issue. BP will accumulate this blather, package it as a sort of consensus, then use it for PR purposes. Here’s how this bunk will play out of BP’s spin machine: “Scientists say spill’s impact will last no longer than three years.”

http://oilspillaction.com/tag/oil-spill-compensation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't forget the miles and miles long hulks of death under the waves
roaming how and who knows where. Might want to get those too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Do you mean the plume the size of Manhattan that didn't exist?
then did but disappeared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I read about more than just one, many many mile(s) long plumes
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 07:28 PM by Rex
and I doubt we've heard the last of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. oil everywhere and they expect people to collect it with butterfly nets!
It will wash in and out for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. I keep fixating on the use of the pound instead of the gallon to record amounts
I mean how many gallons does 17,000 pounds represent? And if this is just one area , how many more pounds can we estimate must be floating around down there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC