Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCaskill could face a fight for re-election to Senate in 2012

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:10 PM
Original message
McCaskill could face a fight for re-election to Senate in 2012
WASHINGTON | As the political spotlight shifts to 2012, the glare will be bright in Missouri, where first-term Democratic U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill will face re-election.

Will she confront a hostile electorate and a further darkening of the mood that knocked Democrats out of power in the House and weakened their hold on the Senate?

Or will unemployment improve over the next 24 months, President Barack Obama’s sagging disapproval rating rebound, and the political plates shift yet again?

Though this year’s Senate contest in Missouri was a runaway for Republicans, the state is usually a battleground. But Republicans think McCaskill’s grip on her seat could be perilous.



Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2010/11/14/2430843/mccaskill-could-have-her-work.html#ixzz15PJ8Qtgi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. No Shit.
MO is no "swing state." It is generally reliably repig, no matter what nonsense the pigs are up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It didn't used to be
It was Dem for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, it was. . .
Didn't it get caught up in that goddamn "reagan revolution" and it never went reliably dem again EXCEPT for some outliers? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. MO went for Clinton both times.
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 09:31 PM by iris27
It's considered a "bellweather" that has always voted for the national pres. winner since the 50's, until 2008 when the state was too close to call, but it didn't really matter because Obama had enough electoral votes without it.

We have a Democratic governor right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oops-- my apologies--
I yapped my mouth (or more my typing hand) without knowing what the hell I was talking about- thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. When I was a kid it was pretty solid Dem
I am 57.

In the 70s when I was in college it was mostly Dem. Eagleton, the Democratic senator, was the VP candidate in 72.

It's gone back and forth since Reagan. But there have been spurts of Democratic domination. Carnahan was a Dem governor who served two terms and two of his kids are still elected officials in MO.

Not exactly outliers, IMO.

And compared to Kansas, which hasn't elected Dem Senator since 1930 something, Missouri is a very Democratic state. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. McCaskill won by 46,000 votes in 2006, 3% win is big by MO standards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure hope not, proud2BlibKansan. She is a real fighter. Hope she wins, over and over.
She has thrown her whole life into her career, from the first.

Missouri needs to move away from its Civil War identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't agree with her on every issue
but I'd fight to keep her in office. She's a great Senator, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree.
I've gotten quite irritated with her on several occasions, but I think she's done a great job, and she's very, very conscientious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC