Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I fly. A lot.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:39 AM
Original message
I fly. A lot.
I am NEVER going through one of those backscatter X-ray machines. Never


TSA can grab all the junk they want.



(Better yet, can't they grant some kind of waiver for folks that fly more than 30 times a year?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R. We don't need scanning. We need intelligent profiling.
The way the Israelis do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree, but hasn't there been people previously objecting to any kind of profiling? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think a lot of people automatically and incorrectly associate "profiling" with racial profiling
There are a lot of ways to profile people. Racially is a chickenshit way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Then Israelis must be chickenshits.
"So why, I asked, are we still allowed to board airplanes at Ben-Gurion International Airport with bottles and tubes of liquid brought from home, while in Heathrow or JFK they confiscate our face cream and toothpaste?

'Oh, that's simple," he answered matter of factly. "We use racial profiling, they don't.'

Only after the visit, rereading my notes, I noticed a curious detail in his answer. While the entire interview had been conducted in Hebrew, he had said those two words, "racial profiling," in English.

To Israelis, the practice of picking people out based on racial stereotypes is so self-evident, there isn't even a Hebrew term for it.In the ongoing international debate over airport security, which has followed the failed attempt by Nigerian student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow up a plane carrying himself and 289 others near Detroit, much attention has been paid to the methods used to screen passengers at airports."

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/in-israel-racial-profiling-doesn-t-warrant-debate-or-apologies-1.261075
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Whatever they're doing seems to work pretty well
When was the last time an Israeli flight was hijacked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. No fat contracts for profiling.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Maybe the fear of CAIR suing keeps this from happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. The TSA does currently employ people whose jobs are to sit around and look for
odd body language, behaviors, etc. My brother's ex was one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. I won't fly again till that bullshit is removed. Neither will my wife. I have had
more than enough of the TSA/HSA, and would love to see it all gone, but in the meantime, I'll take a train of drive.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't blame you
I don't plan on flying again either. The last time I flew overseas it was hell. I've never been treated with such a lack of respect.

FUCK THEM.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiordanoBruno Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. We all know
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 11:53 AM by GiordanoBruno
the TSA sexual assault parade does not heighten security.

I'm unfamiliar with the kind of person who is weak and degenerate enough to allow their own body to be fondled in order to create the illusion of security.

I'm also unfamiliar with the kind of person who would let their 13-year old daughter's genitals be touched by a government employee because the government says he or she has to.

Where does this kind of person draw the line? Cavity searches, genital fondling at subway stations, genital fondling when renting trucks, genital fondling before you enter a mall, Droit de seigneur?

Where do you draw the line and under what rationale? Doesn't that rationale work for airport travel as well?

I'm heartsick over this and in my mind the line is drawn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. 'Hands up and legs apart' & a frisking...
I never expected to hear unless I was being arrested.

It seems there would be alternatives to the radiation and invasive pat downs. Israel has better security. But of course they have better trained security professionals. I'm sure they don't waste their time patting down old grannies and toddlers in order to appear 'random'.

GioranoBruno, welcome to D.U.. :D


My concern has long been that US citizens are being conditioned to accept eventual serfdom.

An illustration from the Gulag:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. White House invited scanner CEO on India trip
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 11:57 AM by soryang
While the uproar continues at home, administration says too bad, so sad. Just do what we tell you and quit your bitchin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. I fly 2 to 4 times per week for my job.
I have gone through them and will continue to go through them. It's just not that big of a deal to me. I understand that for some folks it is a big deal, and I respect your stand.

My biggest complaint is that TSA processes passengers about 75% slower through those things. Meaning security lines are going to get even longer and I'll have to arrive at the airport even earlier.

I can't imagine traveling during the holidays with inexperienced travelers and families going through security. The lines will be enormous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Agreed -- been through them and it's no big deal
I'm pretty shocked at the number of prudish people here. It's not much different from walking through a metal detector, unless the thought of some bored employee seeing through your clothes makes you feel all icky. I, frankly, could not care less. As for pat downs, I have undergone more than one fairly invasive one, in front of everybody, several times -- long before these scanners were introduced. It's pretty offensive, but the new technique doesn't sound that different than the old. Anyone who wears an underwire bra has probably had their boobs felt up more than once since 9/11.

An argument about being ineffective or unhealthy I can understand. But I'm surprised at how many people here are so supposedly modest. I'm an old lady and I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. If you are worried about the radiation from a scanner, you'd never fly in the first place
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 12:25 PM by FLPanhandle
The machines have been independently tested emitting between 0.005 and 0.01 mrems of ionizing radiation. A cross country flight at altitude will give you 100 times that amount.

I don't like the machines, but radiation isn't one of the reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Machines in proper working order emit .005 to .01.
Can you guarantee that will always be the case? You walk your fetus through first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Again, even if a machine is producing 10 times what it is supposed to...
It's still a fraction of the ionized radiation you will receive on the flight itself.

If you are that worried about your fetus, you won't be at the airport in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Have you had your vagina touched and your butt cheeks split in those pat downs?
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 12:38 PM by Gormy Cuss
I've had pat downs at airports over the years and neither of those things happened. The new "enhanced" pat down requires both.

The full body scan for every passenger isn't justified by security concerns. It's a justification for buying these very expensive machines. They were initially marketed as secondary screening devices --not primary devices like metal detectors-- but were cost prohibitive for such limited use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. They want to make sure you don't have a toner cartridge up your butt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. That's where I usually store them.
Crap! (so to speak...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Terrorists with frequent flyer miles?
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's EXACTLY what the terrorists want.
I'm not sure what part of it they want, but that's exactly it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Be careful
If you "waive 'er" in front of the TSA ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. a waiver would be great, just as soon an no identity can ever be stolen
I am sure they will get right on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. When they ask you about submitting to the machine, say "I'm here for the Happy Ending!"
The happier you look each time you say it, the less they will want to grope your junk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC