Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murfreesboro mosque can move ahead, judge rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:29 AM
Original message
Murfreesboro mosque can move ahead, judge rules
The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro can build a new
mosque just outside the city, a judge ruled
Wednesday.

For now, at least.

Chancellor Robert Corlew III denied opponents of
the mosque an emergency injunction that would
block the construction of the project, saying they
failed to prove that Rutherford County violated open
meetings laws or illegally approved the site plan. In
spite of the plaintiffs' fiery accusations that Islam is
not a religion but a violent political movement
looking to supplant U.S.laws, Corlew barely
mentioned terrorism or public safety concerns,
saying that the county's planning commission isn't
the proper venue to vet such claims when approving
a site plan.

"We cannot find that the county erred, acted
capriciously, arbitrarily or illegally," Corlew said in
his ruling.

But Corlew didn't let the county completely off the
hook. He said he was troubled by a "striking lack of
communication" between the county and residents
in regard to how the meeting was advertised and
even how members of the planning and county
commissions were informed about the mosque
proposal.

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20101118/NEWS06/11180324/Murfreesboro+mosque+can+move+ahead++judge+rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Its not over, the fight will now take other forms
Delays in permits, very tight inspections, subs may cancel due to boycotts, Indian artifacts will be found on the site, noise regulations will be used to stop the call to prayer by anything but by a human voice, Friday night pig roasts up wind... All of that and more could be coming.

There are also things locals by themselves to further slow, impede, and basically bleed things to death. In one case where residents did not want something done but it was forced by the state, they would park legally on both sides of the street and the required large equipment could not get through. Later strict parking regulation enforcement drove off several contractors. Eventually the builder threw in the towel. Later he was sued for leaving a mess on the site.

Its not over, especially if the locals do not want it. Its also the kind of impediments that a court can not effectively deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC