|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:43 PM Original message |
Lieberman : We Have The DADT Votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. Joe Lieberman. Socially liberal, stupidly conservative on everything else. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I gladly welcome his liberalism on this. I can go back to hating him when he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. This is why the Democrats and Obama didn't just tell him to go play in traffic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Sorry, the Democrats aren't keeping Lieberman around because of gay people and abortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. He's there whether we like it or not. The point is that we didn't just tell him to go caucus with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. And another thing: this douchebag reps CONNECTICUT. Not Alabama, CT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Based on the polling, he's toast in 2012. Oh, well, the MASSIVE Connecticut for Lieberman Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brewens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. So some Republican puts in a poison pill amendment that will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. That is the BIG question. They want a large Amendment process. Can the Dems stick together well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Through the Looking Glass: Log Cabin Republicans, Joe Lieberman & Secretary Gates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. We can't do it without them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. True enough, but as long as it gets done. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. Watch the bastards attach tax cuts for the rich! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. I do not trust this snake. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Yes, we'll see what happens when it's time for the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. LOL. That would be the thumbnail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-18-10 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. NO chance that LIEberman will be able to convince his boyfriends--McCain and Graham, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC