|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:13 AM Original message |
if you're unhappy about tsa rules, why not petition for a rule-making? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because it is boring /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. I post here on the assumption that people read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. is the comment period open? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Look through the appropriate volume of 49 CFR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Wrong...there's no comment period in CFR publications, active comment periods would be in Fed. Reg. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Um ... I suggested petitioning for rule-making. In response, you incoherently asked whether |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Why is asking about a comment period a bad question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. What we have here is a failure to communicate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. yes you do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. Because petitions do not work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. In comparison to what? Noisy anonymous internet outrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Deleted message |
jberryhill
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. I don't think you should disparage the original post like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 04:11 AM Response to Original message |
5. Can you show where someone has successfully done this in the past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 04:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Your question strongly suggests you've never looked at an issue of the FR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Let's say I haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. My suggestion is that you might want to familiarize yourself a bit with Federal rulemaking before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. It's just that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
12. Outside of environmental issues, I doubt many here have considered rulemaking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WestSeattle2
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. I think letters to senators would be more helpful. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
23. You are naive if the PTB give a shit what us "little people" think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Sun Nov-21-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. Why so they can come to your house and cavity search you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC