Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More than half have been cut loose from Obama mortgage-aid program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 03:20 AM
Original message
More than half have been cut loose from Obama mortgage-aid program
WASHINGTON (AP) -- More than half of the 1.4 million homeowners who enrolled in the Obama administration's flagship foreclosure-prevention program have fallen out.

The program is intended to help those at risk of foreclosure by lowering their monthly mortgage payments. But the latest report from the Treasury Department shows that the effort is still plagued by high failure rates.

Approximately 755,000 borrowers, or 54 percent of those who tried to get their payments lowered through the program, have been cut loose through October. That compared to a 53 percent disqualification rate through September...

Low participation means that the program is likely to cost far less than originally forecast. Though Treasury has set aside $50 billion from the federal bailout fund for the housing relief effort, only about $483 million has been spent, auditors said in a report to Congress last month.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MORTGAGE_AID?SITE=NVLAS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's really scary out there for home owners. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. And what percentage would have held their homes with no aid?
When you look at the financial state and risk level of this group, a 46% success rate is quite respectable. Certainly better than zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "Certainly better than zero" - - wow, you set the bar so high. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. My point is this % is respectable for this group
It did some good. Given the situation, no intervention would have resulted in virtually all failing.

What rate of success did you expect or require to consider this program a positive thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC