|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Segami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 07:49 PM Original message |
Ralph Nader : " MY FRIEND BARACK " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. I imagine W* drunk-dialing the WH switchboard more easily than "writing". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. Y'know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Segami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I wonder if Obama has ever read a discussion thread on DU? Just curious and if so, I wonder which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. he best not read this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Segami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 02:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Within a year, the Obama camp will begin ramping up their 2012 re-election campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. The funny thing is, we wouldn't HAVE the wars/war crimes/tax cuts/etc if it weren't for Nader. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. funny thing is, the 200000 democrats who voted for bush had a greater influence on the election.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. "anybody who meets the requirements can run for president without your approval." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
appal_jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. Al Gore was perfectly free to adopt progressive policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. I'd honestly like to know your "progressive" creds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight armadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Never argue with a fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 10:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Only five votes counted in that election. Oh how I wish I could unrec this bulljive every time it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. No Nader, no Sumpreme Court vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. +10000000000000000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
54. No Pat Buchanan, no SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Oh but there you go looking for any reason besides the evil socialist vote stealer Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. There's nothing evil about Socialism... (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
61. no monica lewinsky, gore sails in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. The undeniable truth is Gore wins if Nader doesn't run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-24-10 06:12 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. that's just insane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Really? So there weren't Democrats in Congress enabling W at every turn? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Really? You mean we never had any of those things under a Democratic President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. You're like the Right blaming Clinton for 9-11. Will you ever grow up and take responsibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. Funny thing is how every time Nader makes a speech that is so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
43. FYI-the 2000 election was STOLEN. Gore WON. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
56. pure ignorant and worthless drivel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
68. +1,000,000. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snagglepuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. K and R. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-22-10 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Huh? Big Oil has Big plans that call for the removal of Obama. Therefore, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RZM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Why 'Boy'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RZM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
13. At least he didn't say 'Uncle Tom' this time n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
15. And I can imagine George Bush never being elected, if you hadn't ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. What about all the Dems who voted overwhelmingly for Bush tax cuts, the War on Afghanistan and Iraq, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. So basically, Nader had nothing to do with anything you listed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You may be forgetting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Deleted message |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Delete dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RZM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. He's been saying that the whole time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
55. No Pat Buchanan, no bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
22. Deleted message |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Eventually, you'll learn (just like the Nader voters in 2000 did). Just a question of when. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Really? You're funny. DLC speaking for Nader supporters. What a hoot. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. How about a Democrat advocating voting for a Democrat on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. I'm sorry. In case you missed it, that wasn't the conversation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I voted Nader, 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:48 PM Original message |
Again, right over your head. That was not the conversation. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:48 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Again, right over your head. That was not the conversation. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #42 |
57. I voted for the candidate who spoke for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Do you accuse everyone of being DLC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
51. +1000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
47. Nadar, the GOUND HOG of Democratic politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MShakely (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Sadly funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
32. What's the book Ralph is peddling lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Well said nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
58. And he's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-24-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
72. No, he's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
35. Has Nader apologized for helping Bush steal the 2000 election yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Derp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. Nothing to apologize for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Total BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itchinjim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
38. Fuck Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
45. Nader nails it! Anyone who can't admit the truth he speaks is delusional and in denial. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
50. Fuck you, Nader. You and your massive ego are at least half the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Deleted message |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
52. Ouch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
62. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
66. Nader is an egotistical ass but he is also right as rain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-10 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
67. WHY, oh WHY, is Nader so revered here? HE COST OUR NATION DEARLY!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-24-10 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
71. The question is not, is Obama the same as Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC