Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Francisco overrides mayoral veto, bans Happy Meals with toys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:17 AM
Original message
San Francisco overrides mayoral veto, bans Happy Meals with toys
San Francisco overrides mayoral veto, bans Happy Meals with toys

(CNN) -- The San Francisco, California, Board of Supervisors banned most McDonald's Happy Meals with toys Tuesday. Despite objections and ridicule from opponents, the vote overrode the mayor's veto and officially approved the ban.

The new ordinance, which requires Happy Meals and other fast food with toys to meet new nutritional standards or else be removed from menus, goes into effect December 1, 2011.

The law is the first of its kind for a major American city, and San Francisco officials said they hope other cities would follow. The ordinance seeks to battle a child obesity epidemic by forcing fast-food chains to make any meal with a toy more nutritious for kids.

McDonald's and the restaurant industry contended the government regulation was unwanted by parents. Supporters of the measure, however, said the use of free toys, often tied to characters or themes in new movies, pandered to kids, to get them to buy meals high in fat and calories.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/11/23/california.happy.meals.ban/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid. Just Plain Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. the nanny state is alive and well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. With or without a toy, feeding that shit to kids is nothing short of child abuse.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Living in a highly polluted area life SF/LA/Bakershell is child abuse
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Oh, please. Engage in hyperbole much? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, what stupidity.
What gets me is that the SF Board of Supervisors thinks that even adults are now children, children who can't say NO to their own kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. This really helps the cause.
:crazy: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some thoughts.
First, where are the fruits going to come from?

Second....

"Despite its good intentions, I cannot support this unwise and unprecedented governmental intrusion into parental responsibilities and private choices."

There are some parents who can't exercise responsiblity or do not know how because they are uneducated about healthy eating. We tried PSA on television, but the broadcast networks dump them late into the night or on weekend mornings so there will be little visablity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Who is "we"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC