Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TSA-Proof Underwear for Travelers, prevents the scanners from peeping at your privates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:49 PM
Original message
TSA-Proof Underwear for Travelers, prevents the scanners from peeping at your privates
As travelers head home for Thanksgiving, many are feeling indignant about having to submit to those invasive, full-body scanners at the nation's airports.

But Colorado-based inventor Jeff Buske is offering his best wishes to beleagured flyers in the form of special underwear featuring fig leaf-shaped metallic panels that purportedly prevent the scanners from peeping at your privates. The panels are made from tungsten and other metals designed not to trigger a metal detector.

"We are trying to do our small part to improve general health and enhance dignity," reads a statement on the website of the underwear's maker, Rocky Flats Gear.

Fig leaves not your thing? The undies are also available with floral or clasped hands designs.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20023795-10391704.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which in turn
will get you a private pat down session because you have some strange ninja throwing thingy covering your junk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep...
That's right!

I don't get the logic in refusing to be scanned... I guess to some being touched is less invasive than being viewed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. radiation
Edited on Wed Nov-24-10 01:39 PM by Extend a Hand
exposure is an issue for many. Especially those already receiving large doses for cancer treatments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not to mention the risk for women of child-bearing age
and their male partners. I don't trust the government to make sure these machines are kept properly calibrated. Any woman who is pregnant or hopes to be someday really should opt out of being scanned. Men who hope to be fathers might want to think about what these scanners might do to their manly bits, too.

Mark my words. It's only a matter of time before we see a rise in the incidence of birth defects or fertility problems that will be traced to these, especially for those who travel for work and have been exposed several times to this additional radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's one of the reasons you have a choice...
Pat down, or scan.

The rest of your assertions are really out there. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Most people undergoing radiation treatments...
Don't travel on planes or trains, and they avoid crowds because their immune system is already under attack.

The manufacturer claims you would have to fly 1000 times a year to equal the exposure of one of the new dental low dose x-rays.

That said, this is a company associated with Chertoff... so I think more investigation of their claims is definitely in order; however, if they prove their assertions, the risk is minuscule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "they usually reveal about as much as you do walking around the pool in a tight bathing suit"
Josh Marshall TPM:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/11/lurid_and_corrupt.php?ref=fpblg

"Whatever else you can say about the backscatter scans, they usually reveal about as much as you do walking around the pool in a tight bathing suit. (Note: A number of the more revealing 'backscatter' pics you find on Google are actually fakes.)"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. doesn't cover the important bits anyway
Apparently, whoever is trying to cash in on this underwear has no idea where genitals are located.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm telling you cod pieces are the way to go
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They will Pat you down for sure if they find a cod or any other fish in your pants
Edited on Wed Nov-24-10 01:02 PM by xultar
Just saying



























:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I can't wait to get a pat down myself...
I'm gonna smile..

Oh baby..oh...oh OH...shake my ass a little...OH OH...

Dude, you made me cum :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I just choked on my coffee
and scared the crap out of my sleeping dogs. Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Porno scan" photos were fakes. Pushed by Drudge and the usual suspects.
Cute that this guy wants to cash in on it though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I have a friend traveling soon...
And she is a dentist. She carries a single x-ray film paper clipped to her pocket every day at work to see how much radiation she is getting. She has the new full mouth low dose x-ray machine now, but continues to keep a supply of the single films. She was particularly concerned while working during her pregnancies.

With the old school x-ray machines, she would see a paper clip on the film once in a while. With the new, never. But she wears it anyway, with the thought that perhaps the machine would accidentally leak or some such thing.

She is going to wear her film paper clipped in her pocket for the flights to and from the East Coast this week, and over Christmas. This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. yes very interesting. Please report back if you have the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC