Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I couldn't care less about what the TSA is doing...or Palin's latest brain droppings...but STUXNET

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:38 PM
Original message
I couldn't care less about what the TSA is doing...or Palin's latest brain droppings...but STUXNET
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 10:42 PM by HipChick
has some serious implications..


http://www.scmagazineuk.com/what-is-stuxnet-doing-who-is-to-blame-and-what-has-been-learned-from-it/article/190004/

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/205827/was_stuxnet_built_to_attack_irans_nuclear_program.html

A highly sophisticated computer worm that has spread through Iran, Indonesia and India was built to destroy operations at one target: possibly Iran's Bushehr nuclear reactor.

Iran Was Prime Target, the emerging consensus of security experts who have examined the Stuxnet worm. In recent weeks, they've broken the cryptographic code behind the software and taken a look at how the worm operates in test environments. Researchers studying the worm all agree that Stuxnet was built by a very sophisticated and capable attacker -- possibly a nation state -- and it was designed to destroy something big.

Though it was first developed more than a year ago, Stuxnet was discovered in July 2010, when a Belarus-based security company discovered the worm on computers belonging to an Iranian client. Since then it has been the subject of ongoing study by security researchers who say they've never seen anything like it before. Now, after months of private speculation, some of the researchers who know Stuxnet best say that it may have been built to sabotage Iran's nukes.

<snip>

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/could-stuxnet-mess-with-north-koreas-new-uranium-plant/

Some of the equipment used by the North Koreans to control their centrifuges — necessary for turning uranium into nuclear-bomb-ready fuel — appear to have come from the same firms that outfitted the Iranian nuclear program, according to David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security and a long-time watcher of both nuclear programs. “The computer-control equipment North Korea got was the same Iran got..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two cheers for Stuxnet.
I'd much rather have us sending cyber-missiles than real missiles.

(My guess is it was Israel.)

At the same time, if we're going to be doing this kind of stuff, we'd better be prepared for people aiming these wormweapons at US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've been following this for while

The sophistication is amazing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. No kidding. Somebody knows what they're doing.
And then they have the balls to actually do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Horrors! Victory without mass murder!
Damn those evil Israelis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good on Stuxnet then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Israelis did it
Well, they're not *admitting* it, per se. But whenever someone asks them about it, they just smile and say, "no comment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's my guess, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. The problem is Stuxnet is "out in the wild" and may come back to bite us on the ass. n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Another reason not to waste money on nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy isn't needed at all - it isn't needed to deal with global warming, and it isn't needed to deal with peak oil.
Nuclear energy is dirty, dangerous, expensive, and unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes indeed. Rec'd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if them two young fellows at IBM who I used to discuss
bullet trajectories with were in on this. They were working on crazy algorithms.....the only two guys from computer security that didn't work anywhere near the rest of the computer security dudes and dudettes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC