Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mystery Surrounds Cyber Missile That Crippled Iran's Nuclear Weapons Ambitions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:56 PM
Original message
Mystery Surrounds Cyber Missile That Crippled Iran's Nuclear Weapons Ambitions
Source: FOX News

In the 20th century, this would have been a job for James Bond.

The mission: Infiltrate the highly advanced, securely guarded enemy headquarters where scientists in the clutches of an evil master are secretly building a weapon that can destroy the world. Then render that weapon harmless and escape undetected.

But in the 21st century, Bond doesn't get the call. Instead, the job is handled by a suave and very sophisticated secret computer worm, a jumble of code called Stuxnet, which in the last year has not only crippled Iran's nuclear program but has caused a major rethinking of computer security around the globe.

Intelligence agencies, computer security companies and the nuclear industry have been trying to analyze the worm since it was discovered in June by a Belarus-based company that was doing business in Iran. And what they've all found, says Sean McGurk, the Homeland Security Department's acting director of national cyber security and communications integration, is a “game changer.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/11/26/secret-agent-crippled-irans-nuclear-ambitions/?test=latestnews



Brilliant spectacular success. This gives the world breathing time and is much preferable to bombs taking out the Iranian centrifuges. Now if only the Iranian Green movement could unseat the Mullahs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, I'm wondering, how did this reporter learn so much?
And a Fox News reporter at that?

When they can hardly lift their ass off the couch to investigate what cockroaches are doing in the reporter's own kitchens.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because other sources have already reported it.
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 02:49 PM by alfredo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. That explains a lot!
He probably didn't even mess up the ass groove on his couch!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
herbm Donating Member (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. The first indepth reporting from Fox I've seen since before W.
Great article and a great read. I hope there's a book in this somewhere. Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep.
Seems like we get humongous breakthroughs a couple times a week now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Let's be fair, we actually do these days
We're in a world where new things spring up both quickly and often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The word was "humongous", not "new".
We do indeed generate lots of "new" stuff, but they cannot all be "extraordinary", "game changers" etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not all, but certainly quite a few. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Black Swans everywhere, eh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Game changer" my ass. Compensation prize for the fact that the reactor at Bushehr has gone on line
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 03:01 PM by leveymg
despite all the sword rattling.

Cheez-itz.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dballance Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anything from FOXnoise is BS Propaganda
FOX is an arm of the government and both the Dems and the Repubs. All FOX does is tell people what they want to hear to reassure them our government is protecting them no matter that the government cannot. FOX is drivel for those who need it - weak-minded idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
herbm Donating Member (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. This is the exception to the rule. Curiously who did you vote for? Tea Party
or "Libertarian" like Rand Paul? Or do you know of some honest Dems and Reps, cuase I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
herbm Donating Member (980 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Another overly senstive touch pad duplication. I miss my mouse!
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 03:34 PM by herbm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Brilliant Success! Until it pops up at TMI, or on AMTRAK.
I'm just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. They dont run that model of controller
I would bet. It was targeted code, not script kiddie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Very sophisticated stuff, so they say.
The problem is that it's out there and no doubt adaptable to other uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. that wA MY FIRST THOUGHT TOO...HOW LONG BEFORE IT IS USED ON US,,,BLOWBACK IS ALWAYS A BITCH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't think the code used in the attack would be portable
Professional coder, here. If the article is accurate, the code used in the attack was highly specific to the hardware being targeted. It screwed up the speed at which the centrifuges ran, and lied to the monitor that reports centrifuge health. This is highly specialized code, it wouldn't function for any machines other than the specific make/model that it was written for.

Also, ease up on the caps lock, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. you're correct ....
sorry, the caplock was a wayward pinky...a mistake...they happen

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/stuxnet-clues/

German researcher Ralph Langner was the first to suggest that the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran was the Stuxnet target. Frank Rieger, chief technology officer at Berlin security firm GSMK, believes it’s more likely that the target in Iran was a nuclear facility in Natanz. The Bushehr reactor is designed to develop non-weapons-grade atomic energy, while the Natanz facility, a centrifuge plant, is designed to enrich uranium and presents a greater risk for producing nuclear weapons.

The new information released by Symantec last week supports this speculation.

As Symantec points out in its paper, frequency-converter drives are used to control the speed of another device -– for example, a motor at a manufacturing facility or power plant. Increase the frequency, and the motor increases in speed. In the case of Stuxnet, the malware is searching for a process module made by Profibus and Profinet International that is communicating with at least 33 frequency-converter drives made by either the Iranian firm or the Finnish firm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HisTomness Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Poor Sourcing
Please do not run info from disreputable sources as news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. agreed about Faux but, Wired is not a poor source though....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. wow eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick. So I can keep reading about this.


...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Another kickypooh.



...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Another kick to keep the info flowing on this. Hope to hear more.



...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Kickety doo dah. Kickety ay....



...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC