Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if the US Ambassador to China talked shit about China in a cable released by WikiLeaks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:23 PM
Original message
So if the US Ambassador to China talked shit about China in a cable released by WikiLeaks
And as a result China refused to help out with the North Korea situation are you fine with that?

Look I am for exposing abuses but what is to be gained by a document dump that creates unnecessary tension between the US and other countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Increased transparency?
That's a plus in my book.

I think the content of these cables is likely being a bit oversold, actually. At most, it will simply confirm what people already know.

The embarrassing content, while offensive to some leaders, is probably not any different that the content of their own diplomatic cables.


US DIPLOMAT: Merkel is an uncreative cow.
MERKEL: Oh no, you DIDN'T! <snap>


I think the world will still be spinning tomorrow, but we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that happens, let me know.
Edited on Sun Nov-28-10 01:33 PM by Hissyspit
All kinds of things U.S. government does I'm not fine with.

Here's what we've got so far (from NYT): "¶ Gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea: American and South Korean officials have discussed the prospects for a unified Korea, should the North’s economic troubles and political transition lead the state to implode. The South Koreans even considered commercial inducements to China, according to the American ambassador to Seoul. She told Washington in February that South Korean officials believe that the right business deals would “help salve” China’s “concerns about living with a reunified Korea” that is in a “benign alliance” with the United States."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm fine with the leaks. Stop with the "what if" excuses.
First, North Korea wouldn't have done what they've done without the consent of China, if not the direction.

Second, the excuse you're using is the same one that has been used ad nauseam by those in government to hide all manner of material from the public. MOST of our classified documents are classified to keep them from the public, not to protect truly critical information.

Third, why the repetition? Do you really need a second thread on the same topic? Do you think your argument is bolstered by starting more threads on the same subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unrec and hide thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Could you tell me North Korea's threat to anyone?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. What if these cables were really from secret CIA alien robot ninja assassin zombies from the future?
I mean, as long as we're playing the "What if" game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I find it more likely that the leaks will reveal the real geopolitical reasons....
Edited on Sun Nov-28-10 02:07 PM by Junkdrawer
for the escalation of our involvement in Afghanistan and Pakistan - namely the containment of Chinese influence in the region. And this will NOT be news to China, but it may influence the US publics support of such policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC