A serious thought; do you think DU will be attacked over Wikileaks discussions?

[DainBramaged]

Poll question: A serious thought; do you think DU will be attacked over Wikileaks discussions?

It just dawned on me. I hope we are not.





For those of you who cannot put 2+2 together, since Wikileaks is under a denial of service attack, and a shitload of Bit torrent sites were shut down in the last few days, does it make a little sense now?

[gateley]

1. Attacked by whom? nt

[PeaceNikki]

2. I'd like this clarified, also.

[DainBramaged]

4. "Wikileaks: We are currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack."

2+2=

[PeaceNikki]

6. DDoS attacks happen all the time. Every day. To thousands of sites.

You can go buy a botnet for under $1k that will bring major infrastructures to their knees.

[gateley]

7. Oh. Then, no. I'll go back and vote. (I love polls! ) nt

[GreenPartyVoter]

5. Hordes of Huns!!! :^D

[proud2BlibKansan]

3. Attacked how?

Should I be in my basement?

[DainBramaged]

8. You? yes.

:eyes:

[gateley]

9. Ha! Don't forget this:

:tinfoilhat:

[obxhead]

14. Yes we should. Don't forget the plastic sheeting and duct tape. nt

[davidinalameda]

10. I think the kitteh in the OP looks ready to pounce

just waiting for us to get comfortable and then WHAM!

meow

[rug]

11. If it gets rid of that damn slaughterhouse ad it might be worth it.

[Name removed]

12. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

23. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

13. Only verbally, by chickenhawk trolls with poor language skills.

CONTENT!

[superduperfarleft]

15. Attacked for Wikileaks discussions? Probably not.

But I've been telling people all week that this is actually a Justin Bieber fansite, so you guys might be in trouble when the hordes of thirteen-year-old girls finally get here and find out I was lying. Sorry about that.

[Taverner]

16. Clarity:

A bunch of torrent sites (peer to peer data transfer) were shut down , and once wikileaks posted the cables, they got DOS'd down

My guess they are trying to contain the leak, but its too late. All you need is one copy out there, and boom, its not secure


You can thank BUSH for that too, he (Cheney, really) chose not to go with a full endpoint-to-endpoint security system. Siprnet is where any of these cables can be accessed, and if they had set it up, no laptop or system would be able to connect to Siprnet unless all endpoints (USB cables, disks, etc) were shutdown, and the data could not be copied.

This is possible, but they wanted to be CHEAP

[WHEN CRABS ROAR]

17. Nope, theres bigger fish to fry.

[rcrush]

18. Get over yourself.

[DainBramaged]

24. Mirror mirror on the wall,......

OH and Merry Christmas, but not with those words.

[bemildred]

19. We are not that important. nt

[Journeyman]

20. Why, of course -- this site and the bicyclists! . . .

[Freetradesucks]

21. No, as much as people on this board like to paint

this country as a fascist state where people are singled out and "taken care of", it's just not true.

We have a tremendous amount of freedom here to criticize whoever we want. Even the highest levels of government.

[EFerrari]

22. Not attacked, read. Poor Agent Mike who would rather be watching football.

But, it's a living I guess! :)

[northernlights]

26. good one.

Hi Mike! :hi: Sorry you're missing THE GAME! :cry:

[kgnu_fan]

25. I doubt it. We are just chatting and discussing... I mean people have more important things to do

[Edweird]

27. I don't understand why you think that might happen.

[Bluerthanblue]

28. I hope not, but Mr. Assange began his career as a hacker didn't

he?

I think the threat from either 'side' would be pretty equal- from what I've read and know about both interests.

:hi:

[L0oniX]

29. Hey US gov ...go f*ck yourself.

[petronius]

30. I'm sure there are hackers and vandals who would like to screw with DU, but

talking about wikileaks doesn't alter that risk. And as far as governments are concerned we're an infinitesimal blip on the radar - no agency cares enough about what we say to go to the hassle of knocking us off the net for a few hours or days...

[BlueJazz]

31. No way. "They" are afraid of us.