Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: No evidence that WikiLeaks releases have hurt anyone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:56 PM
Original message
AP: No evidence that WikiLeaks releases have hurt anyone
It sounds like the WikiLeaks disclosures are primarily politically hazardous.



American officials in recent days have warned repeatedly that the release of documents by WikiLeaks could put people's lives in danger.

But despite similar warnings before the previous two releases of classified U.S. intelligence reports by the website, U.S. officials concede that they have no evidence to date that the documents led to anyone's death.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell has said previously that there was no evidence that anyone had been killed because of the leaks. Sunday, another Pentagon official told McClatchy that the military still has no evidence that the leaks have led to any deaths. The official didn't want to be named because of the issue's sensitivity.

It wasn't immediately clear how Sunday's release would endanger secret U.S. programs, though it wasn't difficult to conclude that some of the releases could endanger local officials' political futures.

No evidence that WikiLeaks releases have hurt anyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, it has hurt people, badly.
We now see the fairytale of democracy in America for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well,
that's good news.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. From the media that brought us the Iraq war, no surprise that they still don't get it /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's not the kind of thing you'll find out on CNN.
Or any other media outlet. This is wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You don't think they can tell
the impact of a less than day-old leak yet?

This story is curious (not saying anything will happen), but people are still reading the documents, and there is more to come.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The consequences may never be known.
If the intelligence revealed in the leaks affords a real or potential adversary an edge on the battlefield or in diplomatic circles, it's quite possible that nobody else--including the U.S. government--will ever know that they gained that edge because of something they got out of the leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The US government was sloppy. No low-level personnel
should have had access to that much secret information. I suspect that most of the stuff is gossip and not really secret at all. It's mostly just kept an official secret because that is what diplomats do.

Do you think that the Iranians don't know that a lot of their neighbors detest them? There is nothing new in that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demstud Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a bit early isn't it?
It's been less than 1 day, and that's a lot of documents to sift through. Doesn't it seem a bit early to declare "no one has been hurt" by the leak? I hope it continues to be true, but waaaay to early to claim victory on that front, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Tell that to the Fascism Apologists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Propaganda. Blech*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. What?! How could evil AP report something in support of wikileaks!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC