Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For fucksakes, can we please stop with the Palin threads?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:05 PM
Original message
For fucksakes, can we please stop with the Palin threads?
This women is irrelevant. She does what she does for publicity so that she can make money. She wants us to get all up in arms over what she says so that she can sell books and get million dollar contracts at Fox News by creating controversy. This women has absolutely no power in making any type of policy and as a result does not deserve the attention that she gets in our media and on sites such as DU.

So I will beg my fellow DUers to stop posting about her. By posting anything about her you are only doing her a favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. A freakin Men
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
57. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush was irrelevant.
But he took office anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:11 PM
Original message
Once she actually runs for some kind of office she will be relevent again
currently she is not only not running for office but she also holds no elected office.

Her only role is to create controversy which equals money. We should all know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. you think she's not currently running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. No I don't. I don't think she's seriously that stupid
I think it's an act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
37. Are you sure she isn't campaigning?
I believe she is.

My hope is the GOP rejects her and she runs as an independent or Libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I can't be sure of anything. But I don't think she's running
this is the same women that quit as governor so she could make money. If she wanted to be president she wouldn't have quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
66. I think she gambled.
Her minions aren't concerned about her quitting, & in the meantime she has gained enough personal wealth to make a campaign feasible.

Her 1st priority seems to be getting actually rich as opposed to Wasilla wealthy. Now that she's made some cash and the home-schooled are still worshiping at her alter, she's set her sights back on the White House.


We need to face it: she wants everygoddamthing, and the Xianistas want to give it all to her.

Let's not forget that the Neocons will accept any figurehead they can control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. She is running, and the media loves her. Teabaggers love her and they control the republican
party. They kicked out old republicans and replaced them with the new teabagger republican type for the primary. Every "red" state will go for her in the primaries because the fundamentalists, gay haters, immigrant haters and flag wavers adore her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Self-delete: site lagged and duplicated post
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 07:05 PM by no limit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. How did that work out for them? Reid is still in office thanks to them
Delaware which was practically lost is still D. Joe Miller lost to a sign in candidate.

When it comes to the presidential election I'm pretty sure the republicans aren't that stupid. And I don't think Palin is dumb enough to even run. She quit her governor term half way through, a person that wants to be president doesn't do that. She is in it for the money, and she is willing to generate as much controversy as she can in the 15 minutes that she has since controversy equals money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #49
67. Agreed
Her appetites aren't the kind that get sated by feeding. She's a glutton.

She has a devoted following, and the Neocon insiders will support anyone they think will be electable and controllable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. You first,
O creator of yet another Palin thread....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. My first and only Palin thread since the 08 election. So you got yourself a deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. LOL
Hide thread should be everyone's friend...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. But if you hide the thread
You might miss something about the Palins! Then what would people have to complain about? Well, besides my dazzling display of logic, which has once again run rings around another lesser poster at DU, though that's hardly complaint-worthy.

Bask in my greatness. Bask!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm still laughing...
I'm glad I didn't hide this thread, or I wouldn't have been able to bask...

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree we shouldn't take her seriously. She's an imitation comedienne, a Lucy wannabe.
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 04:13 PM by MissMarple
Lucy was the real deal. Everyone loves Lucy, we can't say the same about the Palin person. But I still wouldn't underestimate her ability to keep some folks stirred up. Eventually, she will just fade away, used and abused, still totally clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. people will talk about what they want to talk about
and your post will hardly change that. you wrote it to indulge in some good old fashioned self-indulgence. Not that there's anything wrong with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I didn't catch that. Could you repeat it again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. people will talk about what they want to talk about
and your post will hardly change that. you wrote it to indulge in some good old fashioned self-indulgence. Not that there's anything wrong with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree it's out of hand
Though I do think she does wield some real political influence. She's 'fair game' for threads I think, but the number she generates is out of proportion with her actual importance. I would also extend the issue to her family. They should be left for the tabloids and fluff publications. I have no interest in what they do or say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. She is like the trainwreck the "looky loos" can't turn away from...
Bush* was like that too. You just kept hoping he would finally do/say the ultimate insane thing that would finally wake up the 20%ers.

Alas, it will never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. so why start another one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hide everything I get sick of seeing...
You should try it. Works like a charm!

Now that I've given you my words of wisdom, I hope you don't mind but I'm going to hide this Palin thread as well. All Palin threads are Palin threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. She gets free (and paid) favorable advertising from the media.Where else will her lies and ignorance
be exposed except online?

I don't think she should go unchallenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. How can you challenge her or her supporters....
if they aren't here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
48. I can challenge her comments. I can challenge the lies she's told. I have a voice on this media and
I'll keep using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. I think you are expressing an opinion about her words or actions but...
I wouldn't say what you are doing fits the definition of "challenge".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Snowdrift Snookie. I can't avert my eyes, she is so damn fascinating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Who's talking about Palin? I thought we were talking about wikileaks and the TSA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. We will if you will. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. For fucksakes, can we please stop with the "For fucksakes, can we please stop with the Palin
threads" threads? (This is, like, the third one in as many days. Actually, I don't care one way or another. I just wanted to type that.)

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. lol, this crossed my mind, too.
I almost posted something similar but got lost in the "can we please stop the 'can we please stop'" loop.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I got a little dizzy myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Right after this one. This will be the last one. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. The only way I'll stop with Palin threads is if the TSA guys stop with their threads.
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 05:07 PM by leeroysphitz
But they won't stop until the wikileaks guys agree to stop posting FIRST.

I think you are out of luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
60. I will stop with the Palin threads when we have MORE cannibalistic fowl threads.
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 08:38 PM by Hissyspit
There are not enough cannibalistic fowl threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. I bypass them all. I don't get the obsession with her here on DU.
I don't buy the "we need to know what the enemy's doing" thing either.

We KNOW what a vapid, race-baiting, moneygrubbing ignoramus she is. We saw all we needed to see in 2008.

Nothing's changed.

If the GOP wants to elevate her to White House contender, that's on them. It's up to the White House or any would-be Dem contenders to be watchful of the GOP's plans.

This idiot doesn't deserve a minute more attention, and why some people want to see her actually run for the White House, knowing how the media will court her and cover for her stupid, bigoted ways is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. Perhaps you are not familiar with the "hide thread" feature?
Just click on the little "x" next to the titles of the threads you want to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Surely the main problem
Edited on Mon Nov-29-10 05:11 PM by dipsydoodle
is actual use of her name which increases search totals. If we used another name for her that would reduce the problem. Appalin' probably would do or maybe Miss Take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. She is NOT irrelevant. She may very well be the next Repug nominee for POTUS.
She is a liar, a moron, a hypocrite, and a bigot; but don't kid yourself. She is, in fact, relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. As soon as she runs for that office okay. But she isn't running, she is scamming us
the more controversy she generates the more money she makes. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Technically, there aren't ANY repukes running AFAIK
But it's all but foregone that she's going to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I don't think so. The story that she would run really took off when she published a book
coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. She makes political comments and attacks every day. And said she may run.
Why should we wait until then to discredit her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Why would you want to make her richer by constantly talking about her?
You aren't going to change any minds about her, all you are doing is giving her free publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. I'm not making her richer. Every post of mine is about her hypocrisy and lies.
You don't know if someone will change their mind about her. Many different people look at DU.

She gets her free positive publicity from the media. The only "publicity" she'll get from me is correction of her lies and exposing her hypocrisy and ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Palin is DU's version of political crack.
We know it's bad for us, but just can't give it up because of a twisted addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. I see about 75 threads on the first page of GD - 2 are Palin
Including yours.

If she'd go away if we quit posting about her then I'd agree.

Not going to happen so I'm not going to quit posting about her if I think it of interest. Or quit reading those that interest me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Un-reccing for another "Palin" thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Ignore is your friend. Unrec is a meaningless tantrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
61. Actually, the un-rec is to keep another "whining about Palin" thread off the greatest page.
The only threads I put on ignore are the photography threads that seem to appear in GD every month.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainlillie Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. ITA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
39. But you just STARTED a Palin thread!
ARe you part of the problem or part of the solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
44. You betcha!
Hey you howdy. I can see ya from Alaska, there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. I think that anything that gives Palin publicity is good news for the Democrats.
I think that a Palin candidacy or a strong-but-failed Palin showing in the Primaries is probably the Dem's best chance for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNLib Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
53. She pretty much made the Tea Party
which has turned a major political party (GOP) into a bunch of knuckle dragging wacka doodles. I'd hardly call her irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I don't think she invented the tea party, I simply think she exploited it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. You first. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
59. Could we just have picture threads?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
62. K&R!!
Take away her microphone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
63. We ignore her at our peril
She is very relevant. 8 years of Bush. Need I say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
65. Why post about the very thing you oppose?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
68. Another Day...Another Palin Scold...
These threads are getting about as common and predictable as the Mooselini threads. And always seems to follow some kind of feeding frenzy around here. There are those who also complain about too many TSA threads (note how many there were yesterday) and surely about the Wikileaks. No matter what the flavor of the day, someone here will complain we're too "obsessed" with the bright shiny toy of the day (translation: pay attention to my agenda instead).

As so many others have said, there's the "Ignore" and "Hide Thread" features here that work very nicely...and it doesn't take a Masters Degree to figure out that if a thread has the name "Palin" or "Alaska" in it, you can be sure it's "another one of those"...simple to move along to find something more to your liking.

Grifterella is one of the few topics around this place that almost everyone agrees upon...the lady's an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
69. Well, we could start threads about Snookie. Hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Tell me, how in the hell did she get famous!!

And then McCain tweeted her!

Oh muh gawd!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
70. Introducing the newest Anti-Anti-Palin Thread....now with More Unintended Irony!!! n/t
K&U
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC